Olympiad Maths Prep

Track / Stage 8 / 148 of 180 #1848 of 2000

Problem 1848

IMO Shortlist mid-range; USAMO P2/P5
Combinatorics Difficulty 8.8 Prove it BMO 2010 Shortlist · Balkan Mathematical Olympiad · 2010

In a soccer tournament each team plays exactly one game with all others. The winner gets 3 points, the loser zero and each team gets 1 point in case of a draw.
It is known that nn teams (n3n \ge 3) took part in a tournament and the final classification is given by an arithmetical progression of points, the last team having only 1 point.
a) Prove that this is not possible in the Championship of the Republic of Moldova (with n=12n=12).
b) Find all values of nn and all configurations when this is possible.

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, read the official solution, then mark yourself honestly — the ladder only means something if the record is true.

Official solution

a) The total number of matches is n(n1)/2n(n-1)/2. Let ww be the number of games ended with a victory and ee the number of games ended in a draw (e1e \ge 1 due to the last team). Thus, w+e=n(n1)/2w+e = n(n-1)/2. If rr is the step of the arithmetical progression, we have that the total number of points in the final classification is
(2+(n1)r)n2=3w+2e=w+2(w+e)=w+n(n1), \frac{(2 + (n-1)r)n}{2} = 3w + 2e = w + 2(w + e) = w + n(n-1),
or
2w2n=n(n1)(r2). 2w - 2n = n(n-1)(r-2).
The case r=0r=0 is obviously impossible (each team should have only 1 point). For r=1r=1 we get 2w=3nn22w = 3n - n^2, a contradiction (for n=3n=3 one has 3 games, w=0w=0, all games ended in a draw, but the last team has only 1 point; the case n3n \ge 3 implies w<0w < 0). If r3r \ge 3, then 2w2n+n(n1)=n(n+1)2w \ge 2n + n(n-1) = n(n+1) in contradiction with the fact that the total number of matches is n(n1)/2n(n-1)/2.
Thus, the only possible value is r=2r=2. In this case w=nw=n and the number of points of each team in decreasing order is the sequence 2n1,2n3,2n5,,12n-1, 2n-3, 2n-5, \dots, 1.
Denote by wiw_i and by eie_i the number of victories and draws of the ii-th classified team (in decreasing order). Note that wi+ein1w_i + e_i \le n-1. Considering the number of points obtained by the first three teams, that is 2n1,2n3,2n52n-1, 2n-3, 2n-5, we get 2n1=3w1+e1=2w1+w1+e12w1+n12n-1 = 3w_1+e_1 = 2w_1+w_1+e_1 \le 2w_1+n-1, that is w1n/2w_1 \ge n/2. Analogously, w2n/21w_2 \ge n/2-1 and w3n/22w_3 \ge n/2-2.
For n7n \ge 7 we obtain that w1+w2+w33n/23>nw_1 + w_2 + w_3 \ge 3n/2 - 3 > n, a contradiction with the fact that the total number of victories is nn. It implies that n6n \le 6 and it is impossible to have n=12n=12.

b) It is clear that such a configuration does not exist for n=3n=3 (w=3,e=n(n1)/2w=0w=3, e=n(n-1)/2-w=0).
The case n=4n=4 is possible, where the points 7,5,3,17, 5, 3, 1 in the final classification are realized by the following results of the matches of teams: T1-T2 (a draw), T1-T3 (T1 won), T1-T4 (T1 won), T2-T3 (T2 won), T2-T4 (a draw), T3-T4 (T3 won).

In this case we have to write 7 points of the third as a sum of at most five numbers of 1's, which is impossible.
Therefore, the only possibility is n=4n=4, the configuration being described above. ☐

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added by this site.