Let p be a prime number of the form 3k+2, such that p>max(m,2018). (Such p exists because there are infinitely many prime numbers of the form 3k+2.) We shall prove that n=p−2019+i, 1≤i≤m satisfies the problem's conditions.
It suffices to prove that
vp((13+20183)(23+20183)…(n3+20183))=1,
as it would result in (13+20183)(23+20183)…(n3+20183) not being a perfect power.
vp((13+20183)(23+20183)…(n3+20183))=vp(13+20183)+vp(23+20183)+⋯+vp(n3+20183).
However, if i exists such that i=p−2018 and vp(i3+20183)>0,
p∣i3+20183⟹i3≡p(−2018)3⟹(i3)3p−2≡p((−2018)3)3p−2⟹(−2018)ip−1≡p(−2018)p−1i⟹(−2018)≡pi⟹p∣i+2018, i=p−2018⟹2p−2019>p−2019+m≥i≥2p−2018
which is a contradiction. Therefore,
vp((13+20183)(23+20183)…(n3+20183))=vp((p−2018)3+20183)=vp(p)+vp(3)=1
Due to L.T.E., which proves the claim. ■