Number theoryDifficulty 4.4Prove itBerkeley Math Circle · United States
If n is a natural number such that 2n+1 and 3n+1 are perfect squares, prove that 5n+3 can't be a prime number.
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.
Solution: Suppose that 5n+3 is a prime number. Let x and y be natural numbers such that x2=2n+1 and y2=3n+1. Then 5n+3=4(2n+1)−(3n+1)=4x2−y2=(2x−y)(2x+y). Since 5n+3 is a prime number and x and y are natural numbers, we must have 2x−y=1, implying that y=2x−1.
Since n=y2−x2, we have that x2=2n+1=2(y2−x2)+1=2((2x−1)2−x2)+1=6x2−8x+3. Thus, 5x2−8x+3=0 and the solutions are x=1 or x=3/5. Since x2=2n+1 for a natural number n, neither of these x would work and we have a contradiction.
Source: MathNet,
licensed CC-BY-4.0.
Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty, ordering) added by this project.