Maths Olympiad Prep

Track / Stage 7 / 213 of 300 #2253 of 2604

Problem 2253

National Olympiad second round; IMO P1/P4
Combinatorics Difficulty 7.5 Prove it IRL ABooklet · Ireland

Let n≥3n \ge 3 be an integer. Determine, as a function of nn, the number of circular arrangements x1,x2,…,xnx_1, x_2, \dots, x_n of the numbers 1,2,…,n1, 2, \dots, n such that
∑i=1n∣xi−xi+2∣=2n−4, \sum_{i=1}^{n} |x_i - x_{i+2}| = 2n - 4,
where the indices ii and i+2i+2 are to be interpreted modulo nn. Note that any rotation of a circular arrangement is considered to be the same circular arrangement, i.e., the circular arrangements x1,x2,x3,…,xnx_1, x_2, x_3, \dots, x_n and x2,x3,…,xn,x1x_2, x_3, \dots, x_n, x_1 are considered to be the same.

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.

Next problem →

Official solutions — 2

Solution 1

Solution 1.
First consider the case when nn is odd. It is easy to see that
S=∑i=1n∣xi−xi+2∣=∑i=1n∣yi−yi+1∣ S = \sum_{i=1}^{n} |x_i - x_{i+2}| = \sum_{i=1}^{n} |y_i - y_{i+1}|
for another circular arrangement y1,y2,…,yny_1, y_2, \dots, y_n. So we can consider
S=∑i=1n∣xi−xi+1∣ S = \sum_{i=1}^{n} |x_i - x_{i+1}|
instead. Now, the numbers 11 and nn must appear somewhere on the circle. Suppose that the numbers between 11 and nn clockwise are z1,z2,…,zkz_1, z_2, \dots, z_k and the numbers between 11 and nn anticlockwise are w1,w2,…,wlw_1, w_2, \dots, w_l, where k+l=n−2k + l = n - 2. Then
∣n−zk∣+∣zk−zk−1∣+⋯+∣z1−1∣≥(n−zk)+(zk−zk−1)+⋯+(z1−1)=n−1 |n - z_k| + |z_k - z_{k-1}| + \dots + |z_1 - 1| \ge (n - z_k) + (z_k - z_{k-1}) + \dots + (z_1 - 1) = n - 1
and
∣n−wl∣+∣wl−wl−1∣+⋯+∣w1−1∣≥(n−wl)+(wl−wl−1)+⋯+(w1−1)=n−1. |n - w_l| + |w_l - w_{l-1}| + \dots + |w_1 - 1| \ge (n - w_l) + (w_l - w_{l-1}) + \dots + (w_1 - 1) = n - 1.
Adding these two inequalities yields
S≥2n−2 S \ge 2n - 2
(for later in the proof, we note that equality occurs if and only if the sequences z1,z2,…,zkz_1, z_2, \dots, z_k and w1,w2,…,wlw_1, w_2, \dots, w_l are in increasing order). Thus we can never have S=2n−4S = 2n - 4 for odd values of nn.

Next consider the case when nn is even. Let the set of numbers appearing in the odd-indexed positions be A\mathcal{A} and let the set of numbers appearing in the even-indexed positions be B\mathcal{B}. Here ∣A∣=∣B∣=n/2|\mathcal{A}| = |\mathcal{B}| = n/2.
Denote by m1m_1 and M1M_1 the minimum and maximum of A\mathcal{A}, and denote by m2m_2 and M2M_2 the minimum and maximum of B\mathcal{B}. Then, using a similar argument to the case of odd nn above, but replacing the numbers 11 and nn by m1m_1 and M1M_1, we have
∑i=1n/2∣a2i−a2i+2∣≥2(M1−m1) \sum_{i=1}^{n/2} |a_{2i} - a_{2i+2}| \ge 2(M_1 - m_1)
and doing the same but this time for the numbers m2m_2 and M2M_2, we have
∑i=1n/2∣a2i+1−a2i+3∣≥2(M2−m2). \sum_{i=1}^{n/2} |a_{2i+1} - a_{2i+3}| \ge 2(M_2 - m_2).
Adding these two inequalities yields
S≥2(M1+M2)−2(m1+m2) S \ge 2(M_1 + M_2) - 2(m_1 + m_2)
It is easy to see that {m1,m2}={1,m}\{m_1, m_2\} = \{1, m\} for some m≤n2+1m \le \frac{n}{2} + 1 and {M1,M2}={M,n}\{M_1, M_2\} = \{M, n\} for some M≥n2M \ge \frac{n}{2}. So
S≥2(n+M)−2(1+m)=2n−2+2(M−m)≥2n−2+2(n2−n2−1)=2n−4 \begin{aligned} S &\ge 2(n + M) - 2(1 + m) = 2n - 2 + 2(M - m) \\ &\ge 2n - 2 + 2\left(\frac{n}{2} - \frac{n}{2} - 1\right) = 2n - 4 \end{aligned}
To obtain equality, without loss of generality the numbers in odd-indexed positions must be placed in increasing order from 11 to n2\frac{n}{2} (both clockwise and anticlockwise). We count the arrangements as follows. First we place 11 and n2\frac{n}{2} somewhere on a circle. Then, we choose any subset of {2,3,…,n2−1}\{2, 3, \dots, \frac{n}{2} - 1\} to be the values placed in increasing order clockwise from 11 to n2\frac{n}{2}. After this, there is only one way to place the remaining values from 1,2,…,n/21, 2, \dots, n/2 in increasing order anticlockwise from 11 to n2\frac{n}{2}. We now have a circular arrangement of the odd-indexed numbers on the circle. This can be done in 2n2−22^{\frac{n}{2}-2} ways. Second, we follow the same procedure for the even-indexed numbers on the circle (this can also be done in 2n2−22^{\frac{n}{2}-2} ways). Finally, the (odd) circular offset between the values 11 and nn can be chosen in n2\frac{n}{2} ways, giving a total of 2n2−2⋅2n2−2⋅n2=n2n−52^{\frac{n}{2}-2} \cdot 2^{\frac{n}{2}-2} \cdot \frac{n}{2} = n2^{n-5} circular arrangements.

Thus the answer to the question is 00 if nn is odd, and n2n−5n2^{n-5} if nn is even.

Solution 2

Solution 2.
For all integers k>0k > 0, we let xn+k:=xkx_{n+k} := x_k. We define a new circular arrangement by setting a1=x1a_1 = x_1, a2=x3a_2 = x_3, and more generally, ak=x2k−1a_k = x_{2k-1}. If nn is odd, say n=2m−1n = 2m-1, we find that am=xna_m = x_n, am+1=x2a_{m+1} = x_2, etc. and we obtain a new circular arrangement a1,a2,…,ana_1, a_2, \dots, a_n of the numbers 1,2,…,n1, 2, \dots, n. If nn is even, say n=2mn = 2m, we find am=xn−1a_m = x_{n-1}, am+1=x1a_{m+1} = x_1 and the circular arrangement a1,a2,…,ama_1, a_2, \dots, a_m (we may call it the a-cycle) contains only half of the numbers 1,2,…,n1, 2, \dots, n. We then define a second circular arrangement (the b-cycle) by bk=x2kb_k = x_{2k} for k=1,2,…,mk = 1, 2, \dots, m. The circular arrangement b1,b2,…,bmb_1, b_2, \dots, b_m contains those numbers from 1,2,…,n1, 2, \dots, n which are not in the a-cycle. With this new notation, we find that
∑i=1n∣xi−xi+2∣=∑i=1n∣ai−ai+1∣if n is odd,(21) \sum_{i=1}^{n} |x_i - x_{i+2}| = \sum_{i=1}^{n} |a_i - a_{i+1}| \quad \text{if } n \text{ is odd,} \quad (21)
∑i=1n∣xi−xi+2∣=∑i=1m∣ai−ai+1∣+∑i=1m∣bi−bi+1∣if n=2m is even.(22) \sum_{i=1}^{n} |x_i - x_{i+2}| = \sum_{i=1}^{m} |a_i - a_{i+1}| + \sum_{i=1}^{m} |b_i - b_{i+1}| \quad \text{if } n = 2m \text{ is even.} \quad (22)
To facilitate the counting required for the problem, we prove the following lemma.

Lemma. If m≥2m \ge 2 and a1,a2,…,ama_1, a_2, \dots, a_m is a circular arrangement of mm distinct positive integers, where we let am+i=aia_{m+i} = a_i for i>0i > 0, then
S(a):=∑i=1m∣ai−ai+1∣≥2m−2 S(a) := \sum_{i=1}^{m} |a_i - a_{i+1}| \geq 2m - 2
with equality only possible when a1,a2,…,ama_1, a_2, \dots, a_m consists of mm consecutive numbers (not necessarily in their natural order) and the largest two numbers are direct neighbours in the cycle.

Proof. We use induction on m≥2m \ge 2. If m=2m = 2, we have
S(a)=∑i=12∣ai−ai+1∣=2∣a1−a2∣≥2 S(a) = \sum_{i=1}^{2} |a_i - a_{i+1}| = 2|a_1 - a_2| \ge 2
with equality only if a2=a1±1a_2 = a_1 \pm 1. If m>2m > 2, after 'rotating' the cycle we can assume that ama_m is the largest number in the cycle. Let the cycle a′a' be obtained from the cycle aa by removing ama_m, i.e. ai′=aia'_i = a_i for i=1,2,…,m−1i = 1, 2, \dots, m-1 but am′=a1′a'_m = a'_1. We then have
S(a)−∣am−1−am∣−∣am−a1∣=S(a′)−∣am−1−a1∣ S(a) - |a_{m-1} - a_m| - |a_m - a_1| = S(a') - |a_{m-1} - a_1|
which implies, because am>am−1a_m > a_{m-1} and am>a1a_m > a_1,
S(a)−S(a′)=2am−am−1−a1−∣am−1−a1∣={2(am−am−1)if am−1>a12(am−a1)if am−1<a1. S(a) - S(a') = 2a_m - a_{m-1} - a_1 - |a_{m-1} - a_1| = \begin{cases} 2(a_m - a_{m-1}) & \text{if } a_{m-1} > a_1 \\ 2(a_m - a_1) & \text{if } a_{m-1} < a_1. \end{cases}
We have am−a1≥1a_m - a_1 \ge 1 as well as am−am−1≥1a_m - a_{m-1} \ge 1, and by inductive hypothesis, S(a′)≥2m−4S(a') \ge 2m - 4, hence S(a)≥2m−4+2=2m−2S(a) \ge 2m - 4 + 2 = 2m - 2 with equality only if S(a′)=2m−4S(a') = 2m - 4 and either a1a_1 or am−1a_{m-1} is equal to am−1a_m - 1. In particular, in case of equality, the cycle a′a' consists of consecutive numbers and its largest number is am−1a_m - 1. The lemma follows. □\square

A direct consequence of the Lemma is that for odd nn we have
∑i=1n∣xi−xi+2∣≥2n−2>2n−4 \sum_{i=1}^{n} |x_i - x_{i+2}| \ge 2n - 2 > 2n - 4
and so f(n)=0f(n) = 0 for odd nn, where f(n)f(n) is the number of circular arrangements that satisfy the conditions of the problem.

Let now n=2mn = 2m be even. From the Lemma we now obtain ∑i=1n∣xi−xi+2∣=S(a)+S(b)≥2m−2+2m−2=2n−4\sum_{i=1}^{n} |x_i - x_{i+2}| = S(a)+S(b) \ge 2m-2+2m-2 = 2n-4. To achieve equality, both cycles, aa and bb, need to consist of consecutive numbers. One of these two cycles contains the numbers 1,2,…,m1, 2, \dots, m, the other the numbers m+1,m+2,…,2mm+1, m+2, \dots, 2m.
The Lemma allows us to count the number of cycles aa that consist of the numbers 1,2,…,m1, 2, \dots, m (or any other mm consecutive numbers) for which S(a)=2m−2S(a) = 2m-2. Let g(m)g(m) be this number. Then g(2)=1g(2) = 1 as there is only one cycle of length two. For m≥2m \ge 2, the lemma implies that after removing the number mm from aa, we are left with a cycle a′a' that consists of the numbers 1,2,…,m−11, 2, \dots, m-1 and which satisfies S(a′)=2m−4S(a') = 2m-4. Moreover, there are exactly two cycles aa which lead to the same a′a', namely the two that are obtained by fitting in mm immediately before or after m−1m-1 in a′a'. Hence g(m+1)=2g(m)g(m+1) = 2g(m) for m≥2m \ge 2 and it follows by induction that g(m)=2m−2g(m) = 2^{m-2}.

To determine f(n)f(n) for n=2mn = 2m even, we may assume that x1=a1=1x_1 = a_1 = 1 so that we don't have to deal with rotational symmetry any more. From the above it then follows that the a-cycle consists of 1,2,…,m1, 2, \dots, m and the b-cycle of m+1,m+2,…,2mm+1, m+2, \dots, 2m. As seen above, there are g(m)=2m−2g(m) = 2^{m-2} possibilities for the a-cycle. There are the same number of possible b-cycles, but when we merge the two to the full cycle x1=a1,x2=b1,x3=a2,x4=b2,…,xn−1=am,xn=bmx_1 = a_1, x_2 = b_1, x_3 = a_2, x_4 = b_2, \dots, x_{n-1} = a_m, x_n = b_m, a rotated b-cycle gives a different result. Therefore, we need to multiply by mm, which is the number of possibilities to choose which element of the b-cycle will become x2x_2. This gives
f(n)=mg(m)2=m22m−4=n2n−5for even n=2m. f(n) = m g(m)^2 = m 2^{2m-4} = n 2^{n-5} \quad \text{for even } n = 2m.
Thus the answer to the question is 00 if nn is odd, and n2n−5n2^{n-5} if nn is even.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty, ordering) added by this project.