Maths Olympiad Prep

Track / Stage 6 / 262 of 400 #1902 of 2604

Problem 1902

National Olympiad, first round
Algebra Difficulty 6.5 Prove it Irish Mathematical Olympiad · Ireland

We say that a doubly infinite sequence
…,s−2,s−1,s0,s1,s2,… \dots, s_{-2}, s_{-1}, s_0, s_1, s_2, \dots
is subaveraging if sn=(sn−1+sn+1)/4s_n = (s_{n-1} + s_{n+1})/4 for all integers nn.

a. Find a subaveraging sequence in which all entries are different from each other. Prove that all entries are indeed distinct.

b. Show that if (sn)(s_n) is a subaveraging sequence such that there exist distinct integers m,nm, n such that sm=sns_m = s_n, then there are infinitely many pairs of distinct integers i,ji, j with si=sjs_i = s_j.

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.

Next problem →

Official solution

a. A sequence (sn)(s_n) is subaveraging iff sn+1=4sn−sn−1s_{n+1} = 4s_n - s_{n-1} for all n∈Zn \in \mathbb{Z}. This is equivalent to sn−1=4sn−sn+1s_{n-1} = 4s_n - s_{n+1} so that we can go backwards by the same recursion. The sequence (sn)(s_n) is completely determined by s0s_0 and s1s_1.

For s0=0s_0 = 0 and s1=1s_1 = 1 we prove by induction that 0≤sn<sn+10 \le s_n < s_{n+1} for all n≥0n \ge 0. The start of the induction is clear and for the step we have sn+1=4sn−sn−1>3sn≥sn≥0s_{n+1} = 4s_n - s_{n-1} > 3s_n \ge s_n \ge 0 for all n≥1n \ge 1.

Moreover, we obtain s−1=−1s_{-1} = -1 and so s−n=−sns_{-n} = -s_n for all n≥1n \ge 1. This implies sn−1<sn≤0s_{n-1} < s_n \le 0 for all n≤0n \le 0 and we have shown that all entries of (sn)(s_n) are distinct.

b. If (sk)(s_k) is subaveraging, then the shifted sequence (tk)(t_k) given by tk=sk+nt_k = s_{k+n} is subaveraging as well, because it satisfies the same recursion. The same is true for the reflected sequence (rk)(r_k) given by rk=s−kr_k = s_{-k}, because the descending recursion sn−1=4sn−sn+1s_{n-1} = 4s_n - s_{n+1} translates into rn+1=4rn−rn−1r_{n+1} = 4r_n - r_{n-1}.

Assume now that (sk)(s_k) is a subaveraging sequence with sn=sms_n = s_m and n<mn < m. Consider the shifted sequence tk=sk+nt_k = s_{k+n} and the reflected and shifted sequence rk=sm−kr_k = s_{m-k}. They satisfy t0=r0=snt_0 = r_0 = s_n and tm−n=rm−n=snt_{m-n} = r_{m-n} = s_n. The difference (dk)(d_k) of these subaveraging sequences, given by dk=tk−rkd_k = t_k - r_k, is subaveraging again (because the recursion is linear). We now have d0=dm−n=0d_0 = d_{m-n} = 0. If d1≠0d_1 \ne 0, we can divide each term of (dk)(d_k) by d1d_1 and obtain another subaveraging sequence qk=dk/d1q_k = d_k/d_1 with q0=0q_0 = 0 and q1=1q_1 = 1. As we have seen in part (a), all entries of this sequence are distinct. This contradicts m−n>0m - n > 0 and qm−n=0q_{m-n} = 0. Therefore, d1=0d_1 = 0 and so dk=0d_k = 0 for all k∈Zk \in \mathbb{Z}. This implies that tk=rkt_k = r_k, i.e. sk+n=sm−ks_{k+n} = s_{m-k} for all k∈Zk \in \mathbb{Z}.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty, ordering) added by this project.