Let Sn−2=∑k=1n−2akak+21 and Qm=∑k=1mak2. The given relation is Sn−2=1−Qn−11 for n≥3.
For n=3:
a1a31=1−a12+a221(1)
This implies a1=1. If a1≥2, then since ai∈N, a3≥1. So a1a31≤2⋅11=21. Also, a12+a22≥22+12=5. So 1−a12+a221≥1−51=54. Thus 21≥54, which is a contradiction. Yielding a1=1.
Moreover, a3=1. If a3=1 (and a1=1), then 1⋅11=1. The equation becomes 1=1−12+a221, which implies 1+a221=0, impossible.
Now we show a2=1. Assume a2≥2 (we know a1=1). LHS of (1) is a1a31=a31. Since a3≥2 (as a3=1), a31≤21. RHS of (1) is 1−a12+a221=1−12+a221. If a2≥2, then 1+a22≥1+22=5. So 1−1+a221≥1−51=54. Thus 21≥54, a contradiction. So a2=1.
Substituting a1=1,a2=1 into (1): a31=1−12+121=1−21=21. So a3=2.
For n=4: The relation is a1a31+a2a41=1−a12+a22+a321. Using a1=1,a2=1,a3=2: 1⋅21+1⋅41=1−12+12+221=1−1+1+41=1−61=65. 21+41=65⟹41=65−63=62=31. So a4=3.
For n=5, we have a1a31+a2a41+a3a51=1−a12+a22+a32+a421. The sum of the first two terms is 65 (from n=4 calculation). 65+a3a51=1−12+12+22+321=1−1+1+4+91=1−151=1514. a3a51=1514−65=3028−25=303=101. Since a3=2, 2a51=101⟹2a5=10⟹a5=5.
The sequence starts 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, ... This appears to be the Fibonacci sequence, where an=Fn (with F1=1,F2=1). We claim that an=an−1+an−2 for n≥3. The right side values are 1−1/Q2=1/2 (for n=3), 1−1/Q3=5/6 (for n=4), 1−1/Q4=14/15 (for n=5). This suggests the identity Qm=∑k=1mak2=amam+1 for the Fibonacci sequence. So the given relation would be ∑k=1n−2akak+21=1−an−1an1.
We prove this claim by induction. The base case n=3 holds: a1a31=1⋅21=21. And 1−a2a31=1−1⋅21=21. Assume the relation holds for n−1, meaning ∑k=1n−3akak+21=1−an−2an−11, and assume ak are Fibonacci numbers up to n−1, and Qm=amam+1 for m≤n−2. We define an=an−1+an−2. We need to show the statement holds for n. LHS for n: ∑k=1n−2akak+21=(∑k=1n−3akak+21)+an−2an1. Using the inductive hypothesis for the sum: LHS = (1−an−2an−11)+an−2an1=1−an−21(an−11−an1)
LHS = 1−an−21(an−1anan−an−1). Since an=an−1+an−2, we have an−an−1=an−2. LHS = 1−an−21(an−1anan−2)=1−an−1an1.
For the RHS, we need to verify Qn−1=an−1an. Qn−1=∑k=1n−1ak2=(∑k=1n−2ak2)+an−12=Qn−2+an−12. By the inductive hypothesis on the sum of squares formula, Qn−2=an−2an−1. So Qn−1=an−2an−1+an−12=an−1(an−2+an−1). Since an=an−1+an−2, Qn−1=an−1an. So the RHS is 1−Qn−11=1−an−1an1. The relation holds for n if we define an using the Fibonacci recurrence. The initial terms a1=1,a2=1 were uniquely determined. The subsequent terms a3,a4,a5 were also uniquely determined by the relation. The Fibonacci sequence Fn (with F1=1,F2=1) matches these terms and satisfies the relation for all n≥3. Thus, the only solution is the Fibonacci sequence an=Fn(1,1,2,3,5,…). ■