(a) Suppose that two such integers, a<b, exist. Let m be the squarefree part of a; a=ms2, s∈Z. Then mb is a square, so since m is squarefree, b=mt2 for some integer t≥s+1. Hence
(1+s1)2≤s2t2=ab<k2(k+1)2=(1+k1)2,
so s>k. Consequently, b=mt2≥m(s+1)2>(k+1)2 – a contradiction.
(b) We show that the statement holds whenever k≥3n−1; if n is odd, the weaker condition k≥2n−1 suffices. We require a LEMMA whose proof offers no difficulty.
LEMMA. If C>0 and n≥2, then (k+1)n>(kn/(n−1)+C)n−1 for all k≥Cn−1.
Now let n be odd, let a be the smallest integer greater than kn/(n−1), and let b=a+1. The n integers an−i−1bi, i=0,1,2,…,n−1, are distinct, and their product is the n-th power of (ab)(n−1)/2. The smallest of them, an−1, exceeds kn, and the largest, bn−1, is at most (kn/(n−1)+2)n−1. By the LEMMA, this is at most (k+1)n when k≥2n−1.
Next, we turn to the case of even n. Let again a be the smallest integer greater than kn/(n−1), and let b=a+1 and c=a+2. Let further xi=an−ibi and yi=bi−1cn−i, i=1,2,…,n−1. Note that
kn<x1<x2<x3<⋯<xn−1<yn−1<yn−2<⋯<y2<y1≤(kn/(n−1)+3)n−1,
so these 2n−2 integers are distinct, and by the LEMMA they are in the proper range when k≥3n−1. We end the proof by showing that we can choose n of these integers so that the product is a perfect n-th power.
If n is divisible by 4, say n=4m, choose
x1,x3,x5,…,x4m−1,y1,y3,y5,…,y4m−1;
their product is the n-th power of amb2m−1cm.
If n=8m+2, m>0, take
x2,x3,x4,…,x4m+2,y2,y3,y4,…,y4m+2;
the product of these is the n-th power of a3mb2m+1c3m.
Finally, if n=8m+6, select
x1,x2,x3,…,x4m+3,y1,y2,y3,…,y4m+3,
in which case the product is the n-th power of a3m+2b2m+1c3m+2.