In the cyclic quadrilateral , the diagonals are not perpendicular to each other. The feet of the perpendiculars from the vertices to the diagonals not passing through these vertices are , respectively. The intersection points of the lines and , and , and , and finally and are , respectively. Prove that is a cyclic quadrilateral, and the center of its circumscribed circle is the intersection point of the segments and .
Problem 1277
Official solution
Solution. Using that
the quadrilaterals and are cyclic, just like and .
By the inscribed angle theorem (in the cyclic quadrilateral ), the chord is seen from points and at the same angle, i.e., . Similarly, in the cyclic quadrilateral , . Thus,
In the cyclic quadrilateral , , and in the cyclic quadrilateral , , so , from which
thus, by the converse of the inscribed angle theorem, is a cyclic quadrilateral.
It remains to show that the center of the circle circumscribed around the cyclic quadrilateral is precisely the intersection of the diagonals of the quadrilateral . Since the lines and are perpendicular to the diagonal , and and are perpendicular to the diagonal , the quadrilateral is a parallelogram, whose center is the intersection of its diagonals. The center of this parallelogram lies on the line through the midpoints of and (the midline of the parallelogram), which is perpendicular to , and every point on this line is equidistant from the lines and .
!
This implies that this line is the perpendicular bisector of the segment . Thus, we have shown that the center of the parallelogram lies on the perpendicular bisector of the segment , and similarly, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of the segment . However, these two lines have only one common point, which is the center of the circle circumscribed around the cyclic quadrilateral .
Remark. If the intersection of the diagonals is , then without loss of generality, we can assume that the angle is acute. In this case, the points lie on the open rays , respectively. For simplicity, we assumed that these points lie in the interiors of ; the statement of the problem can be proven similarly in other cases.