Let be a polynomial of degree greater than or equal to with integer coefficients. An integer is called -[i]representable[/i] if there exists integer numbers and such that . Prove that, if for all , more than half of the integers of the set are -[i]representable[/i], then all the even integers are -[i]representable[/i] or all the odd integers are -[i]representable[/i].
Problem 1765
Official solution
1. **First Claim: The degree of is even.**
Proof: Suppose not, i.e., with odd. Then there exist real numbers and such that if , then , and if , then . This is possible by taking and such that is strictly greater than all local maxima and is strictly smaller than all local minima.
There exists a constant such that if , then for all , where all the roots of belong to .
Now take a large such that . Fix a large integer . For each pair of integers with such that (denoted as ), we classify them as:
- Good: if
- Bad: if exactly one of is less than
- Whatever: if both have sizes smaller than
Clearly, the number of pairs is finite (for all ). So we shall not worry about them.
Now take a pair. Suppose WLOG that . Then
where , and it's if and if .
Now take a good pair. WLOG . So we know that
So we must conclude that if are a solution to , then both and are smaller than (where ). So the total number of solutions must be at most .
But we know that the number of solutions is at least . So sending to infinity, we must have that
which is a contradiction. Hence, the degree of must be even.
2. **Second Claim: Given that the degree of is even, the majority of the solutions for have .**
Proof: The number of solutions where grows smaller than . In fact, we can prove just as we did in Claim 1 that it grows with degree . The proof uses the same arguments as in Claim 1, where we lower their difference by bringing one of them close to the other and then use the lower bound of degree .
3. **Third Claim: There exists a unique rational number such that the polynomial has degree at most .**
Proof: Let . We can write the polynomial explicitly as
which can be rewritten as
Then has always degree at most , as the coefficient of is , since is even.
The coefficient of is , which is if and only if . This is our desired rational .
So we conclude that the polynomial has degree at most . In other words, there is a constant such that for every .
4. **Fourth Claim (Naughty Lemma): We say that a pair is if it satisfies , , , and .**
Proof: Suppose WLOG . The intuition for proving this claim is that you can't directly come up with a bound for this difference, and as , you use the fact that is somehow close to , to then be able to compare their sizes. In other words, we will use the triangular inequality to say that:
We already have an upper bound for , so we're left with finding a bound for . Let if is an integer, and let if is not an integer. So we can say that if , then . If , then . In other words, since , we know that bringing them together will decrease the difference, as . And, as are integers, we know that the difference between and is at least . Since , we can find a constant such that both and are smaller than . So we find that
for some constant and large . (The choice of does not interfere with , so we may suppose as well that ). So this means that if a pair is naughty, then both have to be smaller than for some constant , meaning that there are at most naughty pairs.
5. **Conclusion: Combining everything we proved so far, we must conclude that there is a constant such that the number of solutions for with is at most .**
Then take sufficiently large such that .
So for this large, the number of solutions for with must be at least . Now let . So this directly implies that must be an integer, and it also means that the polynomial covers integers up to . Let be the degree of . Clearly . We know that there is a constant such that for every non-zero . This means that if , then for some constant . Sending to infinity, we conclude that , so .
Then for some integers and . (We may suppose WLOG . If not, we may switch by ). But we know that if , then . So there are at most solutions for , which implies . If , then covers all integers. If , then must cover all even or all odd integers, concluding the problem.