Three, Solution: If 2∣pq, without loss of generality, let p=2, then 2q∣52+5q, so q∣5q+25.
By Fermat's Little Theorem, q∣5q−5, thus q∣30, i.e., q=2, 3, 5. It is easy to verify that the prime pair (2,2) does not meet the requirements, while (2,3) and (2,5) do meet the requirements.
If pq is odd and 5∣pq, without loss of generality, let p=5, then 5q∣55+5q, so q∣5q−1+625.
When q=5, the prime pair (5,5) meets the requirements. When q=5, by Fermat's Little Theorem, we have q∣5q−1−1, hence q∣626. Since q is an odd prime, and the only odd prime factor of 626 is 313, so q=313. After verification, the prime pair (5,313) meets the requirements.
If p,q are neither 2 nor 5, then pq∣5p−1+5q−1, so
5p−1+5q−1≡0(modp).
By Fermat's Little Theorem, we get 5p−1≡1(modp),
so from (1) and (2) we have
5q−1≡−1(modp).
Let p−1=2k(2r−1),q−1=2l(2s−1), where k, l,r,s are positive integers.
If k⩽l, then from (2), (3) it is easy to see
1=12l−k(2s−1)≡(5p−1)2l−k(2s−1)=5l2(2Γ−1)(2s−1)=
(5q−1)2r−1≡(−1)2r−1≡−1(modp),
which contradicts p=2! So k>l.
Similarly, we have k<l, which is a contradiction! Therefore, there are no (p,q) that meet the requirements in this case.
In summary, all prime pairs (p,q) that meet the requirements are
(2,3),(3,2),(2,5),(5,2),(5,5),(5,313) and