a)Prove that 21+31+...+2m1<m, for any m∈N∗. b)Let p1,p2,...,pn be the prime numbers less than 2100. Prove that p11+p21+...+pn1<10
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark
yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.
Official solution
### Part (a) We need to prove that for any m∈N∗: 21+31+⋯+2m1<m
1. Base Case: For m=1: 21<1 This is true.
2. Inductive Step: Assume the statement is true for some m=k, i.e., 21+31+⋯+2k1<k We need to show it holds for m=k+1: 21+31+⋯+2k1+2k+11<k+1 By the inductive hypothesis: 21+31+⋯+2k1<k Adding 2k+11 to both sides: 21+31+⋯+2k1+2k+11<k+2k+11 Since 2k+11<1: k+2k+11<k+1 Therefore: 21+31+⋯+2k1+2k+11<k+1 By induction, the statement is true for all m∈N∗.
■
### Part (b) We need to prove that for the prime numbers p1,p2,…,pn less than 2100: p11+p21+⋯+pn1<10
1. Lemma 1: We have that: p prime≤x∏p≤4x for any positive integer x.
Proof: We use induction. The base cases are trivial. Passing from an odd integer to an even one is very easy (as LHS remains the same while the RHS increases). So we only show how to pass from an even integer to an odd one (i.e., prove the inequality for x=2k+1). We will use the binomial coefficient (k+12k+1). It is easy to see that it is divisible by ∏k+1<p≤2k+1p (the product is taken over primes). Therefore: p≤2k+1∏p≤p≤k+1∏pk+1<p≤2k+1∏p≤4k+1(k+12k+1)≤42k+1 (we used the induction hypothesis and the fact that (k+12k+1)≤22k, which is an easy exercise). The lemma is proved.
2. Lemma 2 (Partial Summation): Let an (n∈N) be a sequence, so that an=0 for n<x0, and S(x)=∑n≤xan. Let f be a function with continuous derivative. Then: n≤x∑anf(n)=S(x)f(x)−∫x0xS(t)f′(t)dt
Proof: Let us note that: n≤x∑anf(n)=n≤x∑(S(n)−S(n−1))f(n)=S(x)f(x)−n≤x∑S(n−1)(f(n)−f(n−1)) As S behaves like a step function constant on [n,n+1), we get that: n≤x∑anf(n)=S(x)f(x)−∫0xS(t)f′(t)dt=S(x)f(x)−∫x0xS(t)f′(t)dt as an=0 for n<x0.
3. Applying Lemmas: From Lemma 1, we have (by taking logarithms) that: p≤n∑log(p)≤nlog(4) for any integer n, so the relation actually holds even if n is any positive real number. We use Lemma 2 with an=log(n) if n is prime and an=0 otherwise. We take f(x)=xlog(x)1. We can take in the lemma x0=2. We have that: p≤x∑p1=n≤x∑anf(n)=S(x)f(x)−∫2xS(t)f′(t)dt=xlog(x)S(x)+∫2xt2log2(t)S(t)(1+log(t))dt Using that S(x)≤xlog(4), we get that: p≤x∑p1≤log(x)log(4)+∫2xtlog2(t)log(4)dt+∫2xtlog(t)log(4)dt The antiderivative of the function in the first integral is log(t)1, so the first integral is at most log(2)log(4)=2, and the antiderivative of the function in the second integral is log(log(x)). We therefore have that: p≤x∑p1≤log(x)log(4)+2+log(4)(log(log(x))−log(log(2))) For x=2100, we have that: p≤2100∑p1≤501+2+log(4)log(100) and the last expression is less than 8.405 (in an olympiad one might use that e is greater than 2.7 and use this to estimate log(2) and log(10)).
■
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.