1. **Assume n≥m**: Without loss of generality, we can assume n≥m to simplify the problem.
2. **Determine the largest k**: We need to find the largest k such that any tree graph G with k vertices has two vertices u and v satisfying the given condition.
3. Upper Bound Analysis:
- For k≥2n+2m+3, consider a path of length 2n+2m+3. This path serves as a counterexample because there will be vertices that are too far apart to satisfy the condition.
- For k≥3n+3, consider three disjoint paths with lengths n+1,n+1,n respectively, and connect these paths with a new vertex at their endpoints. This construction also serves as a counterexample.
4. Lower Bound Analysis:
- Assume k≤min(2n+2m+2,3n+2) and suppose we cannot find such vertices u and v.
- Let A1A2…At be a diameter of the tree, and let Gi be the subtree of Ai not intersecting with the diameter.
- If t≤2n, choosing v=A⌊2t⌋ works because the diameter is short enough.
- Assume t>2n.
5. Choosing Vertices:
- Choose v=An+1 and u=At−m. There must exist a vertex a such that d(a,v)>n and d(a,u)>m. If a∈Gi, then n+1<i<t−m by the diameter assumption.
- Choose v=At−n and u=Am+1. There must exist a vertex b such that d(b,v)>n and d(b,u)>m. If b∈Gj, then m+1<j<t−n by the diameter assumption.
6. Contradiction:
- If i=j, then n+1<i<t−n. This implies there are at least n+n+d(An+1,a)+2≥3n+3 vertices, which contradicts our assumption.
- If i=j, let x=d(a,Ai) and y=d(b,Aj). Summing the inequalities x+d(Ai,An+1)≥n+1 and x+d(At−m,Ai)≥m+1, we get 2x+(t−m−n−1)≥m+n+2. Similarly, we get 2y+(t−m−n−1)≥m+n+2. Summing these, we get x+y+t≥2n+2m+3. Since i=j, there are at least x+y+t vertices in the tree, which is a contradiction.
Therefore, the largest k is min(2n+2m+2,3n+2).
The final answer is min(2n+2m+2,3n+2).