(a) Prove that 22m+1pk≡1(modpk+1).
1. Define a=22m and b=−1. Note that a−b=22m−(−1)=22m+1=p, so p∣a−b.
2. Using the Euclidean Algorithm, we find:
gcd(p,ab)=gcd(22m+1,−22m)=gcd(1,−22m)=1.
Thus, p∣a−b and gcd(p,ab)=1.
3. Apply the Lifting The Exponent (LTE) Lemma with the prime p as the base:
νp(apk−bpk)=νp(pk)+νp(a−b).
4. Since p is odd, pk is also odd, so (−1)pk=−1. Therefore:
νp((22m)pk−(−1)pk)=νp(pk)+νp(p).
5. Simplifying, we get:
νp(22mpk+1)=k+1.
6. Taking modulo pk+1, we have:
22mpk+1≡0(modpk+1),
which implies:
22mpk≡−1(modpk+1).
7. Squaring both sides, we get:
22⋅2mpk≡1(modpk+1),
or equivalently:
22m+1pk≡1(modpk+1).
(b) Prove that 2m+1pk is the smallest positive integer n satisfying 2n≡1(modpk+1).
1. From part (a), we have shown that 22m+1pk≡1(modpk+1). This implies that the order of 2 modulo pk+1 divides 2m+1pk.
2. Since 22mpk≡−1≡1(modpk+1), it follows that ν2(ordpk+1(2))=m+1.
3. Therefore, the order of 2 modulo pk+1 must be of the form 2m+1pi for some i∈{0,1,…,k}.
4. Apply the LTE Lemma again with c=22m+1 and d=1:
c−d=22m+1−1=(22m+1)(22m−1)=p(p−2).
5. Thus, c=p(p−2)+d=p(p−2)+1=p2−2p+1=(p−1)2.
6. Since gcd(p,cd)=gcd(p,(p−1)2)=1, we can apply the LTE Lemma:
νp(cpi−dpi)=νp(pi)+νp(c−d).
7. Substituting c−d=p(p−2), we get:
νp(22m+1pi−1)=i+1.
8. Since ordpk+1(2)=2m+1pi, it follows that:
22m+1pi≡1(modpk+1),
implying:
νp(22m+1pi)≥k+1.
9. Since νp(22m+1pi−1)=i+1, it follows that i+1≥k+1, or i=k since i∈{0,1,…,k}.
10. Hence, we conclude that:
ordpk+1(2)=2m+1pk.