Example 6.2.3 Let x1,x2,⋯,xn be positive real numbers. Prove that x12+(2x1+x2)2+⋯+(nx1+x2+⋯+xn)2≤4(x12+x22+⋯+xn2)
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark
yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.
Official solution
Proof: Let a1,a2,⋯,an be positive real numbers (to be determined). According to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have (a1x12+a2x22+⋯+akxk2)(a1+a2+⋯+ak)≥(x1+x2+⋯+xk)2
The inequality can be rewritten as (kx1+x2+⋯+xk)2≤k2a1a1+a2+⋯+akx12+k2a2a1+a2+⋯+akx22+⋯+k2aka1+a2+⋯+akxk2
For k=1,2,⋯,n, construct similar inequalities and add them together, we have x12+(2x1+x2)2+⋯+(nx1+x2+⋯+xn)2≤γ1x12+γ2x22+⋯+γnxn2
where each coefficient γk is determined by γk=k2aka1+a2+⋯+ak+(k+1)2aka1+a2+⋯+ak+1+⋯+n2aka1+a2+⋯+an
If the sequence (a1,a2,⋯,an) satisfies γk≤4 for k=1,2,⋯,n, then the proof is complete. We choose ak=k−k−1, then a1+a2+⋯+ak=k. In this case, γk=ak1(k3/21+(k+1)3/21+⋯+n3/21)
Notice that (k−21)(k+21)(k−21+k+21)≤2k3/2, so k3/21≤(k+21)(k−21)k+21−k−21=k−211−k+211
We get γk=ak1(∑j=knj3/21)≤ak1(∑j=knj−211−∑j=knj+211)≤akk−212=k−212(k+k−1)<4
Note: The following similar result is left as an exercise. ⋆ Let x1,x2,⋯,xn be positive real numbers, prove: x13+(2x1+x2)3+⋯+(nx1+x2+⋯+xn)3≤827(x13+x23+⋯+xn3)
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.