1. Define the sequence and initial conditions:
Let c≥1 be an integer. Define a sequence of positive integers by a1=c and
an+1=an3−4c⋅an2+5c2⋅an+c
for all n≥1.
2. **Establish the periodicity modulo an:**
We claim that for all integers k, an+k≡ak(modan). This can be shown by induction:
- Base case: For k=1, we have an+1≡c(modan).
- Inductive step: Assume an+k≡ak(modan). Then,
an+k+1=an+k3−4c⋅an+k2+5c2⋅an+k+c≡ak3−4c⋅ak2+5c2⋅ak+c=ak+1(modan).
Thus, an+k+1≡ak+1(modan).
3. **Show that ai≡aj(moda(i,j)):**
By the Euclidean algorithm, for any positive integers i and j, we have ai≡ab(modaj) where i=aj+b and 0≤b<j. Hence, a(i,j)=(ai,aj).
4. **Prove that if n∣i, then ai≡an(modai2):**
Notice that
an+1=5c2⋅an+c(modan2).
Therefore,
an+2≡(5c2⋅an+c)3−4c⋅(5c2⋅an+c)2+5c2⋅(5c2⋅an+c)+c(modan2).
Simplifying, we get:
an+2≡2c2+c≡a2(modan2).
Hence, for all integers k≥2, an+k≡ak(modan2). Thus, ai≡an(modan2).
5. **Assume there exists an integer m such that for all p∣am, there exists 1≤i≤m−1 such that p∣ai:**
Let p1,p2,…,pk be the prime factors of am. Let qi=pim for all 1≤i≤k.
6. **Claim that if p is a prime factor of am, then p∣aqi for some 1≤i≤m−1:**
Suppose not, then there exists 1≤i≤n such that p∣an. From the periodicity, we have p∣a(m,n). Notice that (m,n)=m, hence there exists 1≤i≤k−1 such that (m,n)∣aqi, which implies p∣aqi. This is a contradiction.
7. **Show that am≡aqi(modaqi2):**
From the periodicity, we have:
am≡aqi(modaqi2).
This clearly implies vp(am)=vp(aqi).
8. **Prove that am≥(aqi)2pi:**
Notice that for (c,n)=(1,2), we can show using algebra that:
an+1=an3−4c⋅an2+5c2⋅an+c≥an2.
Therefore, if (c,qi)=(1,2), the inequality follows. If c=1 and qi=2, then m≥4. Since a4=183≥34=a24, we are also done.
9. Derive the final contradiction:
From the previous claims, we have:
am<i=1∏kaqi.
From the inequality, we have:
1<i=1∑k2pi1<i=1∑∞2i1=1,
which is a contradiction.