For each positive integer k, let nk be the smallest positive integer such that there exists a finite set A of integers satisfy the following properties: [list] [*]For every a∈A, there exists x,y∈A (not necessary distinct) that nk∣a−x−y[/*] [*]There's no subset B of A that ∣B∣≤k and nk∣b∈B∑b. [/list] Show that for all positive integers k≥3, we've nk<(813)k+2.
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark
yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.
Official solution
To show that for all positive integers k≥3, we have nk<(813)k+2, we will use the Fibonacci sequence and properties of the set A as described in the problem.
1. Define the Fibonacci Sequence: Let Fi be the Fibonacci sequence, with F1=F2=1. The general term is given by: Fi+2=Fi+1+Fi
2. **Construct the Set A:** For a given k, consider the set A={a1,a2,…,ak+1} where: ai=(−1)k−1−iFi+1fori=1,2,…,k−1 and ak=Fk+1,ak+1=Fk+2
3. **Sum of Elements in A:** Calculate the sum of all elements in A: a1+a2+⋯+ak−1+ak+ak+1=Fk−1+ak+ak+1=Fk−1+(Fk+1)+(Fk+2)=Fk−1+2Fk+3 Using the Fibonacci property Fk−1+Fk=Fk+1, we get: Fk−1+2Fk+3=Fk+2+3 This suggests choosing n=Fk+2+3.
4. Verify the First Condition: We need to show that for every a∈A, there exist x,y∈A such that nk∣a−x−y.
- **Case 1: k is even.** For i=1,2,…,k−3: ai=ai+1+ai+2 Additionally: ak−2≡ak+ak+1(modn),ak−1=ak+1+a2,ak=ak−1+a1,ak+1=ak+a1
- **Case 2: k is odd.** For i=1,2,…,k−3: ai=ai+1+ai+2 Additionally: ak−2≡ak+ak+1(modn),ak−1=ak+a1,ak=ak+1+a1,ak+1=ak−1+a2 In both cases, the first condition is satisfied.
5. Verify the Second Condition: We need to show that there is no subset B⊆A with ∣B∣≤k such that nk∣∑b∈Bb.
- **Base Case: k=3** For k=3, A={−1,2,3,4}. No subset of 3 elements has a sum divisible by F5+3=8.
- Inductive Step: Assume the statement holds for k−1. Since the sum of the elements of A is 0(modn), instead of B, we can consider A∖B without changing anything. So our subset has only one of the elements (ak−1,ak,ak+1)=(Fk,Fk+1,Fk+2).
We can find the minimum and maximum of a subset with at most k elements of B: 1−Fk=−(Fk−1+Fk−3+…)≤b∈B∑b≤(Fk+2)+Fk−2+Fk−4+…=Fk+1+1 If n=Fk+2+3 divides ∑b∈Bb, then ∑b∈Bb must be 0. By the inductive step on k−1, B can't be a subset of {a1,a2,…,ak−2}, so at least one of Fk,Fk+1,Fk+2 is in B. Then: b∈B∑b≥Fk−Fk−1−Fk−2−…=1>0 which gives us a contradiction. So the second condition is satisfied too.
6. Final Calculation: Using ϕ=21+5: nk≤Fk+2+3<ϕk−3(F5+3)=8ϕk−3 But 8<ϕ5, and ϕ<813, so: nk<ϕk+2<(813)k+2 The conclusion follows.
■
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.