3⋅29 Prove that the cube roots of three distinct prime numbers cannot be three terms (not necessarily consecutive) of an arithmetic progression. (2nd United States of America Mathematical Olympiad, 1973)
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark
yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.
Official solution
[Proof] Let p,q,r be distinct prime numbers, and 3p,3q,3r be three terms in an arithmetic sequence. Assume 3p3q3r=a,=a+md,=a+nd,
where m,n are positive integers. Eliminating a,d yields 3r−3p3q−3p=nmm3r−n3q=(m−n)3p
Cubing and expanding gives 3r−3p3q−3p=nmm3r−n3q=(m−n)3p m3r−n3q+3mn3rq(m3r−n3q)=(m−n)3p.
Substituting (1) into the above equation gives m3r−n3q−(m−n)3p=−3mn(m−n)3pqr.
Since p,q,r are all prime numbers, 3pqr is an irrational number. Therefore, the left side of (2) is a rational number, while the right side is an irrational number, making (2) impossible. Thus, 3p,3q,3r cannot be three terms in an arithmetic sequence.
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.