Let P be an arbitrary point on the intersection line of planes S and T, and let E,F be points in space such that PE is parallel to e, PF is parallel to f, and the lengths of segments PE and PF are both unit length. We will show that for the angle ω=EPF,
∣cosω∣≤1/3
holds, which implies the statement of the problem.
!
Let the projections of points E,F onto plane S be denoted by E0 and F0, respectively. According to the problem, E0P is perpendicular to F0P. First, applying the cosine rule and then the Pythagorean theorem, we get:
EF2=2−2cosω=E0F02+(E0E−F0F)2=(PE02+E0E2)+(PF02+F0F2)−2E0E⋅F0F=2−2E0E⋅F0F,
where the distances E0E and F0F are understood with their signs: they have the same sign if they are in the same direction. From the two equations, it follows that
cosω=E0E⋅F0F
Introduce a coordinate system in space such that its origin is at P, the y-axis lies on the intersection line of S and T, the x-axis is in S, the z-axis is in T, and denote the coordinates of E,F by (e1;e2;e3) and (f1;f2;f3), respectively. Then
i=1∑3ei2=i=1∑3fi2=1
and applying (2) without change and then by swapping the roles of S and T, we get
e3f3=e1f1=cosω
In the (x;y) plane, the coordinates of points E0,F0 are (e1;e2) and (f1;f2), respectively. Applying the Pythagorean theorem in the right triangle E0F0P, we get:
(e1−f1)2+(e2−f2)2=(e12+e22)+(f12+f22)
or
e1f1+e2f2=0
From (4) and (5), it is clear that cosω is also equal to −e2f2, so (1) follows from the inequality
∣e1f1−e2f2+e3f3∣≤1
since in our case, the three quantities on the left side are equal.
Thus, only the proof of (6) remains. Let g1=e1, g2=−e2, g3=e3, then (6) follows from the well-known
(i=1∑3figi)2≤i=1∑3fi2i=1∑3gi2
inequality based on (3). The inequality (7) can be shown most simply by noting that the quadratic polynomial
i=1∑3(fi−tgi)2=i=1∑3fi2−2ti=1∑3figi+t2i=1∑3gi2
is non-negative for all real t, so its discriminant cannot be positive.
Remark. If we had not applied the Pythagorean theorem at the beginning of our solution, we would have obtained that
cosω=i=1∑3eifi
It is customary to call the quantity on the right-hand side the dot product of the vectors (e1;e2;e3) and (f1;f2;f3). The name suggests that although we are multiplying vectors, the result is a number, a scalar quantity. It is clearly visible here the dual nature of the concept of multiplication: there are times when the product of two quantities is of the same type as the multiplicands, and there are times when the product is a single real number that expresses the relationship between the quantities, regardless of their type. In the latter case, if the product is 0, it is customary to say that the quantities are perpendicular, since in two and three dimensions, we call vectors perpendicular if they are geometrically perpendicular.