Maths Olympiad Prep

Track / Stage 6 / 345 of 400 #1345 of 1964

Problem 1345

National olympiad, first round
Geometry Difficulty 6.6 Prove it

Let ee and ff be lines, and SS and TT be planes, about which we know the following: SS is perpendicular to TT,

taking the orthogonal projections of lines ee and ff onto plane SS, these projections are perpendicular to each other, and similarly, their projections onto plane TT are also perpendicular to each other.

Show that the angle between lines ee and ff deviates from a right angle by less than 2020^{\circ}.

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.

Official solution

Let PP be an arbitrary point on the intersection line of planes SS and TT, and let E,FE, F be points in space such that PEPE is parallel to ee, PFPF is parallel to ff, and the lengths of segments PEPE and PFPF are both unit length. We will show that for the angle ω=EPF\omega = EPF,

cosω1/3 |\cos \omega| \leq 1 / 3

holds, which implies the statement of the problem.

!

Let the projections of points E,FE, F onto plane SS be denoted by E0E_0 and F0F_0, respectively. According to the problem, E0PE_0P is perpendicular to F0PF_0P. First, applying the cosine rule and then the Pythagorean theorem, we get:

EF2=22cosω=E0F02+(E0EF0F)2=(PE02+E0E2)+(PF02+F0F2)2E0EF0F=22E0EF0F, EF^2 = 2 - 2 \cos \omega = E_0F_0^2 + (E_0E - F_0F)^2 = (PE_0^2 + E_0E^2) + (PF_0^2 + F_0F^2) - 2E_0E \cdot F_0F = 2 - 2E_0E \cdot F_0F,

where the distances E0EE_0E and F0FF_0F are understood with their signs: they have the same sign if they are in the same direction. From the two equations, it follows that

cosω=E0EF0F \cos \omega = E_0E \cdot F_0F

Introduce a coordinate system in space such that its origin is at PP, the yy-axis lies on the intersection line of SS and TT, the xx-axis is in SS, the zz-axis is in TT, and denote the coordinates of E,FE, F by (e1;e2;e3)(e_1; e_2; e_3) and (f1;f2;f3)(f_1; f_2; f_3), respectively. Then

i=13ei2=i=13fi2=1 \sum_{i=1}^{3} e_i^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{3} f_i^2 = 1

and applying (2) without change and then by swapping the roles of SS and TT, we get

e3f3=e1f1=cosω e_3 f_3 = e_1 f_1 = \cos \omega

In the (x;y)(x; y) plane, the coordinates of points E0,F0E_0, F_0 are (e1;e2)(e_1; e_2) and (f1;f2)(f_1; f_2), respectively. Applying the Pythagorean theorem in the right triangle E0F0PE_0F_0P, we get:

(e1f1)2+(e2f2)2=(e12+e22)+(f12+f22) (e_1 - f_1)^2 + (e_2 - f_2)^2 = (e_1^2 + e_2^2) + (f_1^2 + f_2^2)

or

e1f1+e2f2=0 e_1 f_1 + e_2 f_2 = 0

From (4) and (5), it is clear that cosω\cos \omega is also equal to e2f2-e_2 f_2, so (1) follows from the inequality

e1f1e2f2+e3f31 |e_1 f_1 - e_2 f_2 + e_3 f_3| \leq 1

since in our case, the three quantities on the left side are equal.

Thus, only the proof of (6) remains. Let g1=e1g_1 = e_1, g2=e2g_2 = -e_2, g3=e3g_3 = e_3, then (6) follows from the well-known

(i=13figi)2i=13fi2i=13gi2 \left(\sum_{i=1}^{3} f_i g_i\right)^2 \leq \sum_{i=1}^{3} f_i^2 \sum_{i=1}^{3} g_i^2

inequality based on (3). The inequality (7) can be shown most simply by noting that the quadratic polynomial

i=13(fitgi)2=i=13fi22ti=13figi+t2i=13gi2 \sum_{i=1}^{3} (f_i - t g_i)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{3} f_i^2 - 2t \sum_{i=1}^{3} f_i g_i + t^2 \sum_{i=1}^{3} g_i^2

is non-negative for all real tt, so its discriminant cannot be positive.

Remark. If we had not applied the Pythagorean theorem at the beginning of our solution, we would have obtained that

cosω=i=13eifi \cos \omega = \sum_{i=1}^{3} e_i f_i

It is customary to call the quantity on the right-hand side the dot product of the vectors (e1;e2;e3)(e_1; e_2; e_3) and (f1;f2;f3)(f_1; f_2; f_3). The name suggests that although we are multiplying vectors, the result is a number, a scalar quantity. It is clearly visible here the dual nature of the concept of multiplication: there are times when the product of two quantities is of the same type as the multiplicands, and there are times when the product is a single real number that expresses the relationship between the quantities, regardless of their type. In the latter case, if the product is 0, it is customary to say that the quantities are perpendicular, since in two and three dimensions, we call vectors perpendicular if they are geometrically perpendicular.

Source: NuminaMath-1.5, licensed Apache-2.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added by this site.