Number theoryDifficulty 8.8Find the answerchina_team_selection_test
Let a,b be two integers such that their gcd has at least two prime factors. Let S={x∣x∈N,x≡a(modb)} and call y∈S irreducible if it cannot be expressed as product of two or more elements of S (not necessarily distinct). Show there exists t such that any element of S can be expressed as product of at most t irreducible elements.
A number or a short expression. Spacing and $ signs are ignored.
Official solution
Let a and b be two integers such that their greatest common divisor (gcd) has at least two prime factors. Define the set S={x∣x∈N,x≡a(modb)} and consider an element y∈S to be irreducible if it cannot be expressed as the product of two or more elements of S (not necessarily distinct). We aim to show that there exists an integer t such that any element of S can be expressed as the product of at most t irreducible elements.
Let d=gcd(a,b) and express a and b as a=dp and b=dq, where gcd(p,q)=1. Let r and s be two distinct primes that divide d, and write d=rusvd0 where gcd(d0,rs)=1 and u,v∈Z+.
We first investigate when d(p+nq) is reducible, i.e., when there exist a1,a2,…,aℓ∈Z+ with ℓ>1 such that d(p+nq)=i=1∏ℓ(d(p+aiq)). This implies p+nq=dℓ−1i=1∏ℓ(p+aiq), where d(p+aiq) are irreducible for all i. Clearly, we must have dℓ−1∣p+nq. Also, reducing modulo q gives us p≡dℓ−1pℓ(modq), implying gcd(q,d)=1.
Now, consider a reducible d(p+nq)∈S that can be factored as d(p+nq)=i=1∏N(d(p+aiq)), where d(p+aiq) are irreducible for all i and N>2q. By our choice of N, there exist w≥2 and 0≤z<q−1 such that N−2=w(q−1)+z.
For each i, let ui=νr(p+aiq) and vi=νs(p+aiq). For 1≤x≤y≤N, define Ux,y=∑i=xyui and Vx,y=∑i=xyvi. Also, for any integer k, let k be the unique integer such that k∈{1,2,…,q−1} and k≡k(modq−1).
We now have the following: i=1∏w(q−1)+2(d(p+aiq))=dw(q−1)+2rU1,w(q−1)+2sV1,w(q−1)+2i=1∏w(q−1)+2ruisvip+aiq=T0dw(q−1)rU1,w(q−1)+2−U1,(w−1)(q−1)+1−U(w−1)(q−1)+2,w(q−1)+2sV1,w(q−1)+2−V1,(w−1)(q−1)+1−V(w−1)(q−1)+2,w(q−1)+2×T1drU1,(w−1)(q−1)+1sV1,(w−1)(q−1)+1k=1∏(w−1)(q−1)+1ruisvip+aiq×T2drU(w−1)(q−1)+2,w(q−1)+2sV(w−1)(q−1)+2,w(q−1)+2k=(w−1)(q−1)+2∏w(q−1)+2ruisvip+aiq.
Note that for j∈{1,2}, Tj/d≡p(modq) implies Tj∈S. Moreover, νr(Tj/d)≤q−1 and νs(Tj/d)≤q−1. Both inequalities independently imply that Tj can be factored into at most M:=max{1+uq−1,1+vq−1} irreducible terms.
Now, we deal with T0. It is easy to see that νr(T0),νs(T0)≥0 and νr(T0),νs(T0)≡0(modq−1). So, we multiply all the power of r and also d0w(q−1) to T1 and multiply all the power of s to T2. We get that T1/d and T2/d remain constant modulo q and also maintain νs(T1/d),νr(T2/d)≤q−1.
Thus, so far we have proved that we can factor ∏i=1w(q−1)+2(d(p+aiq)) into at most 2M irreducible terms. We simply add the remaining z terms and conclude that we can factor d(p+nq) into at most q−1+2M terms. Hence, for any d(p+nq)∈S that can be factored into N>2q terms, there exists a factorization that uses only q−1+2M terms. Therefore, t=max{2q,q−1+2M} works, and we are done. ■
The answer is: \boxed{t = \max \{ 2q, q - 1 + 2M \}}.
Source: Omni-MATH,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.