First, we calculate the value of 72(23)n for each integer from n=−3 to n=4, inclusive: 72(23)−372(23)−272(23)−172(23)072(23)172(23)272(23)372(23)4=72⋅3323=72⋅278=364=72⋅3222=72⋅94=32=72⋅3121=72⋅32=48=72⋅1=72=72⋅2131=72⋅23=108=72⋅2232=72⋅49=162=72⋅2333=72⋅827=243=72⋅2434=72⋅1681=2729 Therefore, there are at least 6 integer values of n for which 72(23)n is an integer, namely n=−2,−1,0,1,2,3.
Since 6 is the largest possible choice given, then it must be the correct answer (that is, it must be the case that there are no more values of n that work).
We can justify this statement informally by noting that if we start with 72(23)4=2729, then making n larger has the effect of continuing to multiply by 23 which keeps the numerator odd and the denominator even, and so 72(23)n is never an integer when n>3. A similar argument holds when n<−2.
We could justify the statement more formally by re-writing 72(23)n=32⋅23⋅3n⋅2−n=323n232−n=32+n23−n For this product to be an integer, it must be the case that each of 32+n and 23−n is an integer.
(Each of 32+n and 23−n is either an integer or a fraction with numerator 1 and denominator equal to a power of 2 or 3. If each is such a fraction, then their product is less than 1 and so is not an integer. If exactly one is an integer, then their product equals a power of 2 divided by a power of 3 or vice versa. Such a fraction cannot be an integer since powers of 3 cannot be “divided out" of powers of 2 and vice versa.)
This means that 2+n≥0 (and so n≥−2) and 3−n≥0 (and so n≤3).
Therefore, −2≤n≤3. The integers in this range are the six integers listed above.