Assume that there is a quadruple (a,b,n,m) such that
rad(an+bn)=rad(am+bm).
Let d be the greatest common divisor of an+bn and am+bm. We claim that
d={a(n,m)+b(n,m),(a+b,2),v2(n)=v2(m)v2(n)=v2(m)
where v2(n) denotes the exponent of 2 in the decomposition of n. We set
k=min{v2(n),v2(m)}mn.
Since an≡−bn(modd) and am≡−bm(modd), we get ak≡bk≡−bk(modd) if v2(n)=v2(m). Thus d=(a+b,2), since a2≡0,1(mod4). If v2(n)=v2(m) then we may assume that
n,m are odd and (n,m)=1, i.e., nu+mv=1 for some positive integers u,v. Hence the claim follows from a≡anu+mv≡((−b)n)u((−b)m)v≡−b(modd).
Since rad(an+bn)=rad(d), it suffices to consider the case that v2(n)=v2(m). In this case, without loss of generality, we may assume that n is odd and m=1. Then we can easily get a contradiction from the following lemma.
Lemma. Let p be an odd prime. If a>b and (a,b)=(2,1) then there is a prime q such that q∣ap+bp and q∤a+b.
Proof. Assume that rad(ap+bp)=rad(a+b). Then rad(A)∣rad(a+b), where A denotes the integer (ap+bp)/(a+b). If q is a prime divisor of (A,a+b) then it is clear that q=p. Hence A≤p by the lifting the exponent lemma. On the other hand, we have
A=(a−b)i=1∑(p−1)/2ap−2ib2(i−1)+bp−1≥ap−2+bp−1≥3p−2+1>p,
which yields a contradiction. □