Let ω1 and ω2 be the incircles and O1 and O2 the incenters of the quadrilaterals ABED and AECD respectively. A point F with the stated property exists only if ω1 and ω2 are also the incircles of the quadrilaterals ABCF and BCDF.

Let the tangents from B to ω2 and from C to ω1 (other than BC) meet AD at F1 and F2 respectively. We need to prove that F1=F2 if and only if AB∥CD.
Lemma. The circles ω1 and ω2 with centers O1 and O2 are inscribed in an angle with vertex O. The points P,S on one side of the angle and Q,R on the other side are such that ω1 is the incircle of the triangle PQO, and ω2 is the excircle of the triangle RSO opposite to O. Denote p=OO1⋅OO2. Then exactly one of the following relations holds:
OP⋅OR<p<OQ⋅OS,OP⋅OR>p>OQ⋅OS,OP⋅OR=p=OQ⋅OS.
Proof. Denote ∠OPO1=u, ∠OQO1=v, ∠OO2R=x, ∠OO2S=y, ∠POQ=2φ. Because PO1, QO1, RO2, SO2 are internal or external bisectors in the triangles PQO and RSO, we have
u+v=x+y(=90∘−φ).(1)

By the law of sines
OO1OP=sinusin(u+φ) and OROO2=sinxsin(x+φ).
Therefore, since x,u and φ are acute,
OP⋅OR≥p⇔OO1OP≥OROO2⇔sinxsin(u+φ)≥sinusin(x+φ)⇔sin(x−u)≥0⇔x≥u.
Thus OP⋅OR≥p is equivalent to x≥u, with OP⋅OR=p if and only if x=u.
Analogously, p≥OQ⋅OS is equivalent to v≥y, with p=OQ⋅OS if and only if v=y. On the other hand x≥u and v≥y are equivalent by (1), with x=u if and only if v=y. The conclusion of the lemma follows from here.
Going back to the problem, apply the lemma to the quadruples {B,E,D,F1},{A,B,C,D} and {A,E,C,F2}. Assuming OE⋅OF1>p, we obtain
OE⋅OF1>p⇒OB⋅OD<p⇒OA⋅OC>p⇒OE⋅OF2<p.
In other words, OE⋅OF1>p implies
OB⋅OD<p<OA⋅OC and OE⋅OF1>p>OE⋅OF2.
Similarly, OE⋅OF1<p implies
OB⋅OD>p>OA⋅OC and OE⋅OF1<p<OE⋅OF2.
In these cases F1=F2 and OB⋅OD=OA⋅OC, so the lines AB and CD are not parallel.
There remains the case OE⋅OF1=p. Here the lemma leads to OB⋅OD=p=OA⋅OC and OE⋅OF1=p=OE⋅OF2. Therefore F1=F2 and AB∥CD.