Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / /38 of 53

Geometry Difficulty 6.6 National olympiad Prove it China

An integer nn is called good if n3n \ge 3 and there are nn lattice points P1,P2,,PnP_1, P_2, \dots, P_n in the coordinate plane satisfying the following conditions: If line segment PiPjP_iP_j has a rational length, then there is PkP_k such that both line segments PiPkP_iP_k and PjPkP_jP_k have irrational lengths; and if line segment PiPjP_iP_j has an irrational length, then there is PkP_k such that both line segments PiPkP_iP_k and PjPkP_jP_k have rational lengths.
(1) Determine the minimum good number.

Solution

We claim that the minimum good number is 55, and that 20052005 is good.

It is not difficult to see that n=3n=3 is not a good number. Note that n=4n=4 is also not a good number. Assume on the contrary that there are lattice points P1,P2,P3,P4P_1, P_2, P_3, P_4 satisfying the conditions of the problem. Without loss of generality, we assume that P1P2P_1P_2 is rational and (P1,P2,P3)(P_1, P_2, P_3) is good. Then (P2,P3,P4)(P_2, P_3, P_4) must be good. Neither (P2,P4,P1)(P_2, P_4, P_1) nor (P2,P4,P3)(P_2, P_4, P_3) is good, violating the condition of the problem. Hence our assumption was wrong and n=4n=4 is not a good number.

For n=5n=5, we define the set
S5={P1=(0,0),P2=(1,0),P3=(5,3),P4=(8,7),P5=(0,7)}. S_5 = \{P_1 = (0, 0), P_2 = (1, 0), P_3 = (5, 3), P_4 = (8, 7), P_5 = (0, 7)\}.

It is not difficult to see that all triples (Pi,Pj,Pk)(P_i, P_j, P_k) are good. Hence n=5n=5 is minimum good number.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.