Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / China Western Mathematical Olympiad /18 of 51

China Western Mathematical Olympiad

Algebra Difficulty 5.7 AIME, harder Prove it China

It is given that real numbers x1,x2,…,xnx_1, x_2, \dots, x_n (n>2n > 2) satisfy ∣∑i=1nxi∣>1\left|\sum_{i=1}^n x_i\right| > 1, ∣xi∣≤1|x_i| \le 1 (i=1,2,…,ni=1, 2, \dots, n). Prove that there exists a positive integer kk such that ∣∑i=1kxi−∑i=k+1nxi∣≤1\left|\sum_{i=1}^k x_i - \sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i\right| \le 1. (posed by Leng Gangsong)

Solution

Proof Set g(0)=−∑i=1nxig(0) = -\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i, g(k)=∑i=1kxi−∑i=k+1nxig(k) = \sum_{i=1}^{k} x_i - \sum_{i=k+1}^{n} x_i (1≤k≤n−11 \le k \le n-1), g(n)=∑i=1nxig(n) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i.
Then
∣g(1)−g(0)∣=2∣x1∣≤2,|g(1) - g(0)| = 2|x_1| \le 2,
∣g(k+1)−g(k)∣=2∣xk+1∣≤2,k=1,2,…,n−2,|g(k+1) - g(k)| = 2|x_{k+1}| \le 2, \quad k = 1, 2, \dots, n-2,
∣g(n)−g(n−1)∣=2∣xn∣≤2.|g(n) - g(n-1)| = 2|x_n| \le 2.
So for each 0≤k≤n−10 \le k \le n-1,
∣g(k+1)−g(k)∣≤2.1◯ |g(k+1) - g(k)| \le 2. \qquad \textcircled{1}
If the conclusion is not true, by the condition for each kk, 0≤k≤n0 \le k \le n, we have
∣g(k)∣>1.2◯ |g(k)| > 1. \qquad \textcircled{2}
If there is an ii, 0≤i≤n−10 \le i \le n-1, such that g(i)g(i+1)<0g(i)g(i+1) < 0, we may assume that g(i)>0g(i) > 0 and g(i+1)<0g(i+1) < 0. By ②, g(i)>1g(i) > 1 and g(i+1)<−1g(i+1) < -1. Thus ∣g(i+1)−g(i)∣>2|g(i+1) - g(i)| > 2. This contradicts ①. Thus g(0)g(0), g(1)g(1), ..., g(n)g(n) have the same sign. But g(0)+g(n)=0g(0) + g(n) = 0. The contradiction implies that the conclusion is true.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,604 problems in a working order, from Junior Challenge level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.