Taking a=b=c=0, we have 3(f(0))2=0, which implies f(0)=0.
Taking a=1,b=0,c=0, we have 2f(1)=(f(1))2+(f(−1))2. Thus, (f(1)−1)2+(f(−1))2=1. This means either f(1)=1 and f(−1)=±1, or f(−1)=0 and f(1)=0 or 2.
Taking a=1,b=1,c=0, we have 2f(2)−2f(1)=(f(1))2+(f(−1))2=2f(1).
Hence, f(2)=2f(1).
Taking a=1,b=0,c=−1, we have 2f(2)−2f(−1)=(f(2))2+2(f(−1))2. Thus, (f(2)−1)2+2(f(−1)+21)2=1.5. This implies f(2)=0 or 2, and f(−1)=0 or −1.
Combining the above, we conclude that either f(1)=1 and f(−1)=−1, or f(1)=0 and f(−1)=0.
Let g(k)=f(k)2−f(−k)2. We have g(−k)=−g(k) and g(0)=g(1)=0.
When we replace (a,b,c) with (b,c,a) in the original equation, the left side remains the same, and the change in the right side is exactly g(a−b)+g(b−c)+g(c−a)=0. Taking (a,b,c)=(k,1,0), we have g(k−1)+g(1)+g(−k)=0, which implies g(k)=g(k−1)+g(1). Therefore, we have g(k)=0 for all k∈Z, which means f(−k)=±f(k) for all k∈Z.
Taking (a,b,c)=(k,−1,0) and (a,b,c)=(k,1,0) in the original equation and comparing the two resulting equations, we have
(6)2(f(k)−f(−k))=(f(k+1))2−(f(k−1))2
Consider the first case where f(1)=f(−1)=0. We will prove by mathematical induction that f(k)=f(−k)=0 for all non-negative integers k. The base cases k=0 and k=1 have been established. Assume that f(±k)=0 and f(±(k−1))=0 hold. From equation (6), we obtain (f(k+1))2=0, which implies f(k+1)=0 and f(−k−1)=±f(k+1)=0. Thus, the induction hypothesis holds.
Therefore, in the first case, we have f(m)=0 for all m∈Z.
Now, consider the second case where f(1)=1 and f(−1)=−1. We have f(2)=2f(1)=2.
By substituting (a,b,c)=(k,1,−1) and (a,b,c)=(k,1,1) into the original equation and comparing the resulting equations, we obtain
2f(2k+1)−2f(−1)=(f(−1−k))2−(f(1−k))2+(f(2))2.
(7)f(2k+1)=21(f(k+1))2−21(f(k−1))2+1
By substituting (a,b,c)=(k,2,0) and (a,b,c)=(k,−2,0) into the original equation and comparing the resulting equations, we have
(8)2f(2k)−2f(−2k)=(f(k+2))2−(f(k−2))2
By substituting k=1 into equation (7), we have f(3)=3.
By substituting k=2 into equation (8), we obtain (f(4))2=2(f(4)−f(−4)). If f(4)=0, then substituting k=3 into equation (6) yields f(3)−f(−3)=−2, which implies f(−3)=5=±f(3), leading to a contradiction. Therefore, f(4)=0. Since f(−4)=±f(4), specifically f(−4)=−f(4), we have (f(4))2=4f(4), which implies f(4)=4.
---
We will now prove by mathematical induction that f(m)=m for all non-negative integers m. The base cases m=0,1,2,3,4 have been established. Assume that f(k)=k holds for k=0,1,2,…,m−1.
For m=2k+1≥5, using equation (7), we obtain f(2k+1)=21((f(k+1))2−(f(k−1))2)+1=2k+1.
For m=2k≥6, utilizing equation (8), we have f(2k)−f(−2k)=21((f(k+2))2−(f(k−2))2)=4k. Furthermore, f(−2k)=±f(2k), which implies 2f(2k)=4k and f(2k)=2k.
Hence, we conclude that f(m)=m for m∈Z+. For positive integers m, substituting k=m into equation (6) gives us
2(f(m)−f(−m))=(f(m+1))2−(f(m−1))2=4m,⇒f(−m)=−m.
Therefore, in the second case, we have f(m)=m for all m∈Z.
Upon verification, we find that both solutions, f(m)=0 and f(m)=m, satisfy the given conditions. □