Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / /255 of 397

, 2023

Algebra Difficulty 6.2 National Olympiad Prove it Taiwan

Let f:NR>0f: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}_{>0} be a given increasing function that takes positive values.
For any pair (m,n)(m, n) of positive integers, we call it disobedient if f(mn)f(m)f(n)f(mn) \neq f(m)f(n). For any positive integer mm, we call it ultra-disobedient if for any nonnegative integer NN, there are always infinitely many positive integers nn satisfying that (m,n),(m,n+1),,(m,n+N)(m, n), (m, n + 1), \dots, (m, n + N) are all disobedient pairs.
Show that if there exists some disobedient pair, then there exists some ultra-disobedient positive integer.

Solution

We will show the contrapositive of the statement. In particular, we will show that if there are no ultra-disobedient positive integers, then there exists a nonnegative integer α\alpha with f(n)=nαf(n) = n^\alpha for any nNn \in \mathbb{N}.

We first show that f(1)=1f(1) = 1. Since 11 is not ultra-disobedient, there exists nNn \in \mathbb{N} with f(n)=f(n)f(1)f(n) = f(n)f(1), showing that f(1)=1f(1) = 1.

Now let a,ba, b be two arbitrary positive integers greater than 11. We will show that logf(a)/loga=logf(b)/logb\log f(a)/\log a = \log f(b)/\log b. Since none of them is ultra-disobedient, there exist non-negative integers N,MN, M such that for any n>Mn > M, some of (a,n),,(a,n+N)(a, n), \dots, (a, n + N) and some of (b,n),,(b,n+N)(b, n), \dots, (b, n + N) are obedient.

By symmetry, it suffices to show that logf(a)/logalogf(b)/logb\log f(a)/\log a \ge \log f(b)/\log b. Assume for the sake of contradiction that logf(a)/loga<logf(b)/logb\log f(a)/\log a < \log f(b)/\log b. Then loga/logb>logf(a)/logf(b)\log a/\log b > \log f(a)/\log f(b), and by the density of rationals we can find p,qNp, q \in \mathbb{N} such that loga/logb>p/q>logf(a)/logf(b)\log a/\log b > p/q > \log f(a)/\log f(b).

xqaqk(aq1++1)N,ypbpk+(bq1++1)N. x_q \geq a^q k - (a^{q-1} + \dots + 1)N, \quad y_p \leq b^p k + (b^{q-1} + \dots + 1)N.
Since aq>bqa^q > b^q, we can choose kk large enough so that xq>ypx_q > y_p. This then gives that f(a)qf(b)pf(a)^q \geq f(b)^p, or logf(a)/log(b)>p/q\log f(a)/\log(b) > p/q. This is a contradiction. Therefore logf(a)/logalogf(b)/logb\log f(a)/\log a \geq \log f(b)/\log b, and thus logf(a)/loga=logf(b)/logb\log f(a)/\log a = \log f(b)/\log b by symmetry. We can now let α=logf(2)/log2\alpha = \log f(2)/\log 2 and complete the proof.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement translated into English from zh; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.