Problem:
A country with cities has some two-way roads connecting certain pairs of cities. Someone notices that if the country is split into two parts in any way, then there would be at most roads between the two parts (where is a fixed positive integer). What is the largest integer (in terms of and ) such that there is guaranteed to be a set of cities, no two of which are directly connected by a road?
, 2023
Solution
Solution:
The answer is .
Call a collection of cities independent if no two cities in the collection are joined by a road. Let and be integers such that where .
First we show that . Let denote a set of cities such that every pair of cities in is linked by a road. Consider a country containing copies of and one copy of . An independent set of cities in this country contains at most one city from each or and therefore contains at most cities. Now note that any partition of the cities of the country into two new countries partitions each and into two sets. If where is partitioned into two sets of cities of sizes and , then the number of roads between the two sets is . Summing this inequality over all copies of and yields that there are at most roads between the two new countries. This implies that this particular country satisfies the given condition and it follows that .
Now we show that any country satisfying the given condition has an independent set containing at least cities. Call a set of cities -separable if it can be partitioned into disjoint independent sets of cities. Given a country satisfying the conditions, let be a largest set of cities in the country that is -separable. We prove that . By definition of , there exists a partition of the cities in such that each is independent. Let . Assume for contradiction that . There are at most roads between and the rest of the country, which by the pigeonhole principle implies that there is a city not in that is connected to at most cities by road. Therefore is joined by a road to at most cities in , and there must be an independent subset such that is not linked by a road to any city in . Adding to maintains the fact that is -separable but contradicts its maximality. Therefore it must follow that . By the pigeonhole principle, one of the sets must contain at least cities. This proves the claim and therefore .