We prove the requested statement by induction. For n=1, we only look at the number 11, so the statement is trivially true.
Assume as the induction hypothesis that 11,33,55,…,(2n−1)2n−1 are in different residue classes modulo 2n. First, these numbers are also in different residue classes modulo 2n+1. Since φ(2n+1)=2n, it holds that ak≡aℓmod2n+1 if k≡ℓmod2n and a is odd.
The additional numbers we consider can be written as (2n+m)2n+m with 1≤m≤2n−1 and m odd. If we expand (2n+m)2n+m using the binomial theorem, we notice that every term with at least two factors 2n is congruent to 0 modulo 2n+1. Therefore, modulo 2n+1, we have
(2n+m)2n+m≡m2n+m+(2n+m)m2n+m−12n+(22n+m)m2n+m−2(2n)2+…≡m2n+m+(2n+m)m2n+m−12n≡mm+(22n+2nm)mm−1≡mm+2n⋅mm≡mm+2n
where in the last step we used the fact that mm is odd. This means that we can write mm as 2a+1, and then we find that 2n(2a+1)=2n+1a+2n≡2nmod2n+1.
Since the numbers mm from the first group are distinct modulo 2n+1, the numbers from the second group are also distinct modulo 2n+1. From this calculation, we also conclude that the numbers from the first group are different from the numbers from the second group. Suppose that (2n+m)2n+m≡kkmod2n+1 with 1≤k,m≤2n−1, then from this calculation it follows in particular that mm≡mm+2n≡kkmod2n. Therefore, by the induction hypothesis, we know that m=k. But in that case, it holds that (2n+m)2n+m≡mm+2n≡mmmod2n+1.
We conclude that no number from the groups 11,33,55,…,(2n−1)2n−1 and (2n+1)2n+1,(2n+3)2n+3,…,(2n+1−1)2n+1−1 has the same residue class as another number from these two groups. This completes the induction step, and by induction, the statement is true for all natural numbers n.