Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / /210 of 520

Number theory Difficulty 6.3 National olympiad Prove it

16. (ROM 1) IMO2{ }^{\mathrm{IMO} 2} Let n>6n>6 and a1<a2<<aka_{1}<a_{2}<\cdots<a_{k} be all natural numbers that are less than nn and relatively prime to nn. Show that if a1,a2,,aka_{1}, a_{2}, \ldots, a_{k} is an arithmetic progression, then nn is a prime number or a natural power of two.

Solution

16. Let pp be the least prime number that does not divide nn : thus a1=1a_{1}=1 and a2=pa_{2}=p. Since a2a1=a3a2==ra_{2}-a_{1}=a_{3}-a_{2}=\cdots=r, the aia_{i} 's are 1,p,2p1,3p2,1, p, 2 p-1,3 p-2, \ldots We have the following cases: p=2p=2. Then r=1r=1 and the numbers 1,2,3,,n11,2,3, \ldots, n-1 are relatively prime to nn, hence nn is a prime. p=3p=3. Then r=2r=2, so every odd number less than nn is relatively prime to nn, from which we deduce that nn has no odd divisors. Therefore n=2kn=2^{k} for some kNk \in \mathbb{N}. p>3p>3. Then r=p1r=p-1 and ak+1=a1+k(p1)=1+k(p1)a_{k+1}=a_{1}+k(p-1)=1+k(p-1). Since n1n-1 also must belong to the progression, we have p1n2p-1 \mid n-2. Let qq be any prime divisor of p1p-1. Then also qn2q \mid n-2. On the other hand, since q<pq<p, it must divide nn too, therefore q2q \mid 2, i.e. q=2q=2. This means that p1p-1 has no prime divisors other than 2 and thus p=2l+1p=2^{l}+1 for some l2l \geq 2. But in order for pp to be prime, ll must be even (because 32l+13 \mid 2^{l}+1 for ll odd). Now we recall that 2p12 p-1 is also relatively prime to nn; but 2p1=2l+1+12 p-1=2^{l+1}+1 is divisible by 3 , which is a contradiction because 3n3 \mid n.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: NuminaMath-1.5, licensed Apache-2.0. Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic and difficulty added by this site.