For and given real numbers we have the following instructions:
- place out the numbers in some order in a ring;
- delete one of the numbers from the ring;
- if just two numbers are remaining in the ring: let be the sum of these two numbers. Otherwise, if there are more the two numbers in the ring, replace
Afterwards start again with the step (2). Show that the largest sum which can result in this way is given by the formula
Solution
1. **Base Case: **
For , we have three numbers . We can place them in a ring and delete one number. The remaining two numbers will be summed to give . The possible sums are , , and . The largest sum is , which matches the formula:
2. **Inductive Step: Assume the formula holds for **
Assume the formula holds for numbers. We need to show it holds for numbers.
3. **Constructing the Ring for Numbers**
Consider . Place these numbers in a ring. Delete (the smallest number) first. The remaining numbers form a new ring with numbers.
4. Applying the Induction Hypothesis
By the induction hypothesis, the largest sum for the remaining numbers is:
5. Optimality of the Sum
To prove this is optimal, consider the sums formed after deleting . The sums in the new ring form a cycle graph on vertices. By the induction hypothesis, the sum of these pairs is at most:
6. Using the Lemma
We use the lemma to compare the coefficients of in the sums. Let and be the coefficient of in the sum for numbers. We need to show:
7. Summing the Coefficients
The sum of the coefficients is twice the sum of the binomial coefficients in the induction hypothesis. By the identity:
we get each coefficient twice, matching the sum of .
8. Comparing the Sums
For , we need:
The right sum is a sum of pairs of binomial coefficients, each appearing at most twice. This sum is less than the maximal possible sum, ensuring:
9. Conclusion
By induction, the largest sum for numbers is given by:
This completes the proof.