Let be a finite sequence of real numbers. For each , from the sequence we construct a new sequence in the following way.
1. We choose a partition , where and are two disjoint sets, such that the expression
attains the smallest possible value. (We allow the sets or to be empty; in this case the corresponding sum is .) If there are several such partitions, one is chosen arbitrarily.
2. We set , where if , and if .
Prove that for some , the sequence contains an element such that .
Problem 1952
Official solution
Lemma. Suppose that all terms of the sequence satisfy the inequality . Then there exists a partition into two disjoint sets such that
Proof. Apply an induction on . The base case is trivial. For the induction step, consider a sequence (). By the induction hypothesis there exists a splitting such that
For convenience, suppose that . If then choose , ; otherwise choose , . In both cases, we have and ; hence
as desired.
Let us turn now to the problem. To the contrary, assume that for all , all the numbers in lie in interval . Consider an arbitrary sequence . To obtain the term , we increased and decreased number by one several times. Therefore is always an integer, and there are not more than possible values for . So, there are not more than distinct possible sequences , and hence two of the sequences should be identical, say for some .
For any positive integer , let be the sum of squares of elements in . Consider two consecutive sequences and . Let be the partition used in this step - that is, for all and for all . Since the value of is the smallest possible, the Lemma implies that it is less than . Then we have
.
Thus we obtain . This is impossible since and hence .