Solution:
The required inequality is obviously equivalent to the inequality
p+a2a+p+b2b+p+c2c≤3127
where a+b+c=1 and p=abc+1. We consider the function
f(x)=3x+a2+b2+c23(a+b+c)−x+a2a−x+b2b−x+c2c
We will prove that f(x)≥0 holds for all x≥ab+bc+ca. Reducing the expression for f(x) to a common denominator gives
f(x)=(x+a2)(x+b2)(x+c2)(3x+a2+b2+c2)Ax2+Bx+C
where A≥0≥C. In fact, one easily obtains
A=2a3+2b3+2c3−ab(a+b)−ac(a+c)−bc(b+c)≥0C=−abc[a(b3+c3)+b(c3+a3)+c(a3+b3)−2abc(a+b+c)]≤0
Note that it does not matter what B is. Therefore, the polynomial P(x)=Ax2+Bx+C (if it is not identically 0) has two real roots, one positive (say x=x0) and one negative, and it holds that P(x)≤0 for 0≤x≤x0 and P(x)≥0 for x≥x0. We claim that f(ab+bc+ca)≥0. Indeed,
f(ab+bc+ca)=a2+b2+c2+3(ab+bc+ca)3(a+b+c)−(a+b)(a+c)a−(b+c)(b+a)b−(c+a)(c+b)c=a2+b2+c2+3(ab+bc+ca)3(a+b+c)−(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)2(ab+bc+ca)≥0sincea2+b2+c2+3(ab+bc+ca)3(a+b+c)≥4(a+b+c)9≥(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)2(ab+bc+ca),
which is what we wanted. Therefore, P(ab+bc+ca)≥0, i.e. x0≤ab+bc+ca, from which it follows that P(x)≥0 and f(x)≥0 for all x≥ab+bc+ca. In particular, f(1+abc)≥0 since 1+abc>1>ab+bc+ca. Thus we have proved
1+abc+a2a+1+abc+b2b+1+abc+c2c≤3+a2+b2+c2+3abc3
It remains only to prove that a2+b2+c2+3abc≥94, which together with (1) will give the required inequality. Homogenization gives 9(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2)+27abc≥4(a+b+c)3, which is equivalent to
5(a3+b3+c3)+3abc≥3(ab(a+b)+ac(a+c)+bc(b+c))
The last inequality follows immediately from Schur's inequality. This finally completes the proof of the problem's statement.
Second solution. After homogenization, reducing to a common denominator and simplifying, the inequality reduces to a symmetric inequality which is proved directly by Muirhead's inequality:
223T900+122T810+260T720+282T630+193T540+2547T711+807T620+284T531+91T522−98T441−1669T432−557T333≥0
where Tijk is the symmetric sum xiyjzk+⋯.