Let a,b,c be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that
3a+b+c−3abc≤max{(a−b)2,(b−c)2,(c−a)2}.
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark
yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.
Official solution
1. Claim:x6+y6+z6+3x2y2z2≥2(x3y3+y3z3+z3x3)
Proof: - By the AM-GM inequality, we have x2+y2≥2xy. - Applying Schur's Inequality, we get: x6+y6+z6+3x2y2z2≥x2y2(x2+y2)+y2z2(y2+z2)+z2x2(z2+x2) - Since x2+y2≥2xy, it follows that: x2y2(x2+y2)≥2x3y3 - Similarly, y2z2(y2+z2)≥2y3z3 and z2x2(z2+x2)≥2z3x3. - Therefore: x6+y6+z6+3x2y2z2≥2(x3y3+y3z3+z3x3) - This proves the claim. ■
2. Back to the original problem: - Assume for the sake of contradiction that: 3a+b+c−3abc≥max{(a−b)2,(b−c)2,(c−a)2} - Adding the cyclic variants, we get: a+b+c−33abc≥(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2 - By the AM-GM inequality, we know: (a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2≥0 - Therefore, we have: a+b+c−33abc≥0 - This implies: a+b+c≥33abc - By the AM-GM inequality, we have: 3a+b+c≥3abc - This is always true, so the assumption does not lead to a contradiction.
3. Plugging in variables: - Let x=6a, y=6b, z=6c. - Then a=x6, b=y6, c=z6. - The inequality becomes: 2(x3y3+y3z3+z3x3)≥x6+y6+z6+3x2y2z2 - This is a contradiction to our earlier claim, so the original assumption must be false.
Therefore, we have proven that: 3a+b+c−3abc≤max{(a−b)2,(b−c)2,(c−a)2}
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.