If, for k=1,2,…,n, ak and bk are positive real numbers, prove that na1a2⋯an+nb1b2⋯bn≤n(a1+b1)(a2+b2)⋯(an+bn); and that equality holds if, and only if, b1a1=b2a2=⋯=bnan.
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark
yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.
Official solution
To prove the inequality na1a2⋯an+nb1b2⋯bn≤n(a1+b1)(a2+b2)⋯(an+bn), we will use the Hölder's inequality.
1. Hölder's Inequality: For positive real numbers ai and bi and for p,q>1 such that p1+q1=1, Hölder's inequality states: (i=1∑naip)p1(i=1∑nbiq)q1≥i=1∑naibi. In our case, we will use p=q=n.
2. Applying Hölder's Inequality: Let ai=xin and bi=yin. Then, we have: (i=1∑nxin)n1(i=1∑nyin)n1≥i=1∑nxiyi. Since ai=xin and bi=yin, we can rewrite the sums as: (i=1∑nai)n1(i=1∑nbi)n1≥i=1∑n(ain1bin1).
3. Simplifying the Expression: Notice that: (i=1∑nai)n1=na1+a2+⋯+an, and similarly for bi. Therefore, we have: na1+a2+⋯+an⋅nb1+b2+⋯+bn≥i=1∑nnaibi.
4. Combining the Results: We need to show that: na1a2⋯an+nb1b2⋯bn≤n(a1+b1)(a2+b2)⋯(an+bn). By the AM-GM inequality, we know that: na1a2⋯an≤na1+a2+⋯+an, and similarly for bi. Therefore: na1a2⋯an+nb1b2⋯bn≤na1+a2+⋯+an+nb1+b2+⋯+bn.
5. Final Step: We need to show that: na1+a2+⋯+an+nb1+b2+⋯+bn≤n(a1+b1)(a2+b2)⋯(an+bn). By the AM-GM inequality again, we have: na1+b1+a2+b2+⋯+an+bn≤n(a1+b1)(a2+b2)⋯(an+bn).
6. Equality Condition: Equality holds if and only if: b1a1=b2a2=⋯=bnan.
Thus, we have proven the inequality and the condition for equality.
■
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.