The coordinates of the vertices of two triangles are:
A(0;0),B(15;0),C(0;5), and D(17.2;19.6),E(26.2;6.6),F(22;21)
Show that any of these triangles can be transformed into the other by reflecting over a suitable line in the plane and then translating parallel to this line. Determine the position (equation) of the axis and the magnitude and direction of the translation.
This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark
yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.
Official solution
I. solution. The two triangles are congruent because the lengths of their sides are equal in pairs: AB=EF=15,BC=DE=250,CA=FD=5 units; in the first triangle, the vertices A,B,C correspond to F,E,D in the second.
The traversal of the vertices of the triangles in the order A,B,C and F,E,D is in opposite directions, i.e., the former is counterclockwise and the latter is clockwise. - Therefore, the two triangles can be transformed into each other by congruence transformations, and among these, there must be an axial reflection, because a rotation and translation in the plane of the drawing do not change the direction of traversal.
!
Figure 1
If there is a line t that meets the conditions of the problem, let the reflection of the FED triangle on this line be F′E′D′. Thus, the midpoint F0 of the segment FF′ is on t. The same is true for the midpoint F1 of the segment FA, because F0F1 is the midline of the triangle FF′A parallel to F′A, and F′A, after the reflection and translation, is parallel to t; thus, we indeed reach F1 from F0 along t. Therefore, the line of the sought axis can be obtained by connecting F1 with the midpoint of another pair of vertices, for example, the midpoint E1 of the segment EB.
The coordinates of F1 are (11;10.5), and those of E1 are (20.6;3.3), from which the equation of t is:
y−10.5=9.6−7.2(x−11)=−43(x−11);3x+4y−75=0
Thus, F0, as the foot of the perpendicular from F to t: F0(13;9), and the coordinates of F′, denoted by u and v,
2u+22=13,u=4,2v+21=9,v=−3;F′(4;−3)
The magnitude of the translation after the reflection is F′A=5 units, the direction is parallel to t, and during the translation, the abscissas of the points decrease. We can also say: the X-component of the translation is -4 units, the Y-component is +3 units. Indeed, the reflections of E and D on t are E′(19;−3) and D′(4;2), and from these, the above translation takes us to B and C.
If we reflect ABC and translate the reflection to FED, then the axis and the magnitude of the translation are the same, but the direction is opposite to the previous one, and during the translation, the abscissas of the points increase.
Kajcsos Zsolt (Szombathely, Nagy Lajos g. IV. o. t.)
!
II. solution. Translate one of the two congruent triangles, for example, FED−t, so that one of its vertices, for example, F, coincides with the corresponding vertex of the ABC triangle, A. Denote the vertices of the translated triangle by F∗=A,E∗,D∗ (Figure 2). Reflect the ABC triangle on the bisector of the angle between the corresponding sides, for example, the bisector f of ∠BAE∗. The triangle ABC transforms into F∗E∗D∗ (and only with this reflection). Now translate F∗E∗D∗ in a direction perpendicular to f so that E∗ lands on the perpendicular projection E1 of E on the line BE∗, and the new positions of D∗ and F∗ are D1 and F1. Then, on the one hand, the triangle F1E1D1 is the reflection of the triangle ABC on the perpendicular bisector t of the segment BE1, which is parallel to f, and on the other hand, translating F1E1D1 so that E1 lands on E, the triangle transforms into FED, since the corresponding sides of the two triangles are parallel and equal. This translation is perpendicular to E1B, hence parallel to t. Thus, we have found a reflection and a translation that meet the requirements of the problem.
Given the data of the problem, E∗ and D∗ can be obtained by reducing the abscissas by 22 and the ordinates by 21: E∗(4.2;−14.4),D∗(−4.8;−1.4). The bisector of ∠BAE∗ is the line connecting A with the midpoint A1(9.6;−7.2) of the segment BE∗, because the triangle BAE∗ is isosceles; its slope is −7.2/9.6=−3/4. Now, the point E1 is the intersection of the line through B with slope −1/(−3/4)=4/3 and the line through E with slope −3/4, the lines 4x−3y=60 and 3x+4y=105: E1(−22.2;9.6), so the X and Y components of the translation are -4 and 3. The axis of reflection is the line through the midpoint (18.6;4.8) of the segment BE1 with slope −3/4, its equation is: 3x+4y−75=0.
Balla Katalin (Budapest, Radnóti M. gyak. g. IV. o. t.)
Note. The first part of the solution only used the fact that the two triangles are congruent and have opposite traversal directions. Thus, we have generally shown that one of two such triangles can always be transformed into the other by a reflection and a translation parallel to the reflection axis.
Source: NuminaMath-1.5,
licensed Apache-2.0.
Statement and solution reproduced as published; topic, difficulty and ordering added
by this site.