Solution:
a.
We have
4f(x)+f(y)+f(z)≥(∗)4(f(x)+f(y+z))≥(∗)16f(x+y+z).
Adding to this the cyclically permuted versions f(x)+4f(y)+f(z)≥… and f(x)+f(y)+4f(z)≥…, we obtain 6(f(x)+f(y)+f(z))≥48f(x+y+z) and, dividing by 6, the claim.
b.
Yes, such f,x,y,z exist. Consider the piecewise affine-linear function f with breakpoints (2k,2−k) for k∈Z, explicitly: for each k∈Z let f be defined on the interval [2k,2k+1[ by
f(x)=−22k+1x+2k+13 for 2k≤x<2k+1.
Thus f is defined for all x∈Q+. For all x we have f(2x)=21f(x), so (*) becomes equivalent to the convexity inequality 21(f(x)+f(y))≥f(2x+y). The function f is convex, hence also elastic. With x=y=z=1 we have
f(x)+f(y)+f(z)=3<9⋅83=9f(x+y+z).