Maths Olympiad Prep

Library / /104 of 169

, 2010

Algebra Difficulty 7.5 National Olympiad, round 2 Prove it United States

The 2010 positive numbers a1,a2,,a2010a_1, a_2, \dots, a_{2010} satisfy the inequality aiaji+ja_i a_j \le i + j for all distinct indices i,ji, j. Determine, with proof, the largest possible value of the product a1a2a2010a_1 a_2 \cdots a_{2010}.

Solution

(By Gabriel Carroll). Multiplying together the inequalities a2i1a2i4i1a_{2i-1}a_{2i} \le 4i - 1 for i=1,2,,1005i = 1, 2, \dots, 1005, we get
a1a2a201037114019.(1) a_1 a_2 \cdots a_{2010} \le 3 \cdot 7 \cdot 11 \cdots 4019. \qquad (1)
It remains to show that this bound can be attained.
Let
a2008=401740184019,a2009=401940174018,a2010=401840194017, a_{2008} = \sqrt{\frac{4017 \cdot 4018}{4019}}, \quad a_{2009} = \sqrt{\frac{4019 \cdot 4017}{4018}}, \quad a_{2010} = \sqrt{\frac{4018 \cdot 4019}{4017}},
and define aia_i for i<2008i < 2008 by downward induction using the recursion
ai=(2i+1)/ai+1. a_i = (2i + 1)/a_{i+1}.
We then have
aiaj=i+jwhenever j=i+1 or (i,j)=(2008,2010).(2) a_i a_j = i + j \quad \text{whenever } j = i + 1 \text{ or } (i, j) = (2008, 2010). \qquad (2)
We will show that (2) implies aiaji+ja_ia_j \le i+j for all i<ji < j, so that this sequence satisfies the hypotheses of the problem. Since a2i1a2i=4i1a_{2i-1}a_{2i} = 4i-1 for i=1,,1005i = 1, \dots, 1005, the inequality (1) is an equality, so the bound is attained.
We show that aiaji+ja_ia_j \le i+j for i<ji < j by downward induction on i+ji+j. There are several cases:

* If j=i+1j = i + 1, or (i,j)=(2008,2010)(i,j) = (2008, 2010), then aiaj=i+ja_ia_j = i + j, from (2).

* If (i,j)=(2007,2009)(i,j) = (2007, 2009), then
aiai+2=(aiai+1)(ai+2ai+3)(ai+1ai+3)=(2i+1)(2i+5)2i+4<2i+2. a_i a_{i+2} = \frac{(a_i a_{i+1})(a_{i+2} a_{i+3})}{(a_{i+1} a_{i+3})} = \frac{(2i+1)(2i+5)}{2i+4} < 2i+2.
Here the second equality comes from (2), and the inequality is checked by multiplying out:
(2i+1)(2i+5)=4i2+12i+5<4i2+12i+8=(2i+2)(2i+4). (2i+1)(2i+5) = 4i^2 + 12i + 5 < 4i^2 + 12i + 8 = (2i+2)(2i+4).

* If i<2007i < 2007 and j=i+2j = i + 2, then we have
aiai+2=(aiai+1)(ai+2ai+3)(ai+2ai+4)(ai+1ai+2)(ai+3ai+4)(2i+1)(2i+5)(2i+6)(2i+3)(2i+7)<2i+2. a_i a_{i+2} = \frac{(a_i a_{i+1})(a_{i+2} a_{i+3})(a_{i+2} a_{i+4})}{(a_{i+1} a_{i+2})(a_{i+3} a_{i+4})} \le \frac{(2i+1)(2i+5)(2i+6)}{(2i+3)(2i+7)} < 2i+2.
The first inequality holds by applying the induction hypothesis for (i+2,i+4)(i+2, i+4) and applying (2) for the other pairs. The second inequality can again be checked by multiplying out: (2i+1)(2i+5)(2i+6)=8i3+48i2+82i+30<8i3+48i2+82i+42=(2i+2)(2i+3)(2i+7)(2i+1)(2i+5)(2i+6) = 8i^3 + 48i^2 + 82i + 30 < 8i^3 + 48i^2 + 82i + 42 = (2i+2)(2i+3)(2i+7).

* If ji>2j - i > 2, then
aiaj=(aiai+1)(ai+2aj)ai+1ai+2(2i+1)(i+2+j)2i+3<i+j. a_i a_j = \frac{(a_i a_{i+1})(a_{i+2} a_j)}{a_{i+1} a_{i+2}} \le \frac{(2i+1)(i+2+j)}{2i+3} < i+j.
Here we have used the induction hypothesis for (i+2,j)(i+2, j), and again we check the last inequality by multiplying out: (2i+1)(i+2+j)=2i2+5i+2+2ij+j<2i2+3i+2ij+3j=(2i+3)(i+j)(2i+1)(i+2+j) = 2i^2+5i+2+2ij+j < 2i^2+3i+2ij+3j = (2i+3)(i+j).

This covers all the cases and shows that aiaji+ja_ia_j \le i+j for all i<ji < j, as required.

Want a route through all this instead of an archive? The track puts 2,000 problems in a working order, from AMC 10 level to the IMO shortlist.

Source: MathNet, licensed CC-BY-4.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty) added by this project.